Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27281 - 27290 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] Judy Hartman v. Winnebago County
of law which we review de novo, benefitting from the analyses of the circuit court and the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17094 - 2017-09-21

2010 WI APP 152
judgment is well-known. We review the denial or grant of a summary judgment motion de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55831 - 2010-11-16

Frontsheet
stipulated to the facts, this appeal only raises a question of law, which we review de novo."). [7] Id. [8
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138970 - 2015-03-31

2009 WI APP 58
decisions de novo, using the same well-known methodology as the circuit court. See Lambrecht v. Estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36092 - 2009-05-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2015AP1357-CR 7 deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180727 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Susan Hatleberg v. Norwest Bank Wisconsin
, which this court reviews de novo. Stephenson v. Universal Metrics, Inc., 2002 WI 30, ΒΆ15, 251 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18925 - 2017-09-21

State v. Thomas H. Bush
. The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Randall, 192 Wis. 2d 800, 824
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18883 - 2005-07-05

Henry C. Reget v. Norma Zelazo Paige
to by the parties, constitute oppression is a question of law, which we decide de novo. Davis v. Sheerin, 754 S.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15319 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jimmie R.R.
, the question becomes one that we review de novo. See State v. Pepin, 110 Wis.2d 431, 439, 328 N.W.2d 898
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14684 - 2017-09-21

Marine Bank v. Taz's Trucking Incorporated
granted Marine Bank's motion for summary judgment. We review the grant of summary judgment de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18406 - 2005-06-01