Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27281 - 27290 of 39408 for indicated.
Search results 27281 - 27290 of 39408 for indicated.
State v. Krystal G. J.
does not indicate that a separate sanction may not be imposed for the first violation of each condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9323 - 2005-03-31
does not indicate that a separate sanction may not be imposed for the first violation of each condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9323 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Nikolas J. Tries
-driving charge. ¶4 Although the trial court originally indicated that it was going to sentence Tries
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15784 - 2017-09-21
-driving charge. ¶4 Although the trial court originally indicated that it was going to sentence Tries
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15784 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
in the record to indicate the statement was untrue. Moreover, as the court acknowledged, when the DOC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32080 - 2014-09-15
in the record to indicate the statement was untrue. Moreover, as the court acknowledged, when the DOC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32080 - 2014-09-15
State v. Agripino Barbosa
monitoring bracelet and indicated you smoked apparently approximately a pound of marijuana while on absconder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3715 - 2005-03-31
monitoring bracelet and indicated you smoked apparently approximately a pound of marijuana while on absconder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3715 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the following limits unless different limits are indicated by official traffic signs: …. (e) Twenty-five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98184 - 2014-09-15
of the following limits unless different limits are indicated by official traffic signs: …. (e) Twenty-five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98184 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. § 19.37(2)(a). There is no indication in the record before this court that the DPW raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150270 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. § 19.37(2)(a). There is no indication in the record before this court that the DPW raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150270 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
, however, that the trial court indicated if it had known the specific diagnosis at the initial sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4655 - 2017-09-19
, however, that the trial court indicated if it had known the specific diagnosis at the initial sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4655 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jane A. Sliwinski
or crime, (2) there is a clear indication that the blood draw will produce evidence of intoxication, (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6015 - 2017-09-19
or crime, (2) there is a clear indication that the blood draw will produce evidence of intoxication, (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6015 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the statutory factors altogether. And, as I have noted, A.J.P. concedes that the court’s discussion indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257443 - 2020-04-13
of the statutory factors altogether. And, as I have noted, A.J.P. concedes that the court’s discussion indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257443 - 2020-04-13
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court docket entries do not indicate that Judge Mawdsley held a hearing or otherwise took evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46214 - 2010-01-26
. The circuit court docket entries do not indicate that Judge Mawdsley held a hearing or otherwise took evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46214 - 2010-01-26