Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27291 - 27300 of 30059 for de.
Search results 27291 - 27300 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
G.H. was born in Des Moines, Iowa, on July 25, 2008, to N.J. and M.H., and J.H. was born in Madison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155669 - 2017-09-21
G.H. was born in Des Moines, Iowa, on July 25, 2008, to N.J. and M.H., and J.H. was born in Madison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155669 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Id. A.P. must satisfy both prongs—deficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760588 - 2024-02-07
is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Id. A.P. must satisfy both prongs—deficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760588 - 2024-02-07
[PDF]
WI APP 175
of confrontation … is an issue subject to de novo review.” State v. Bintz, 2002 WI App 204, ¶6, 257 Wis. 2d 177
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34646 - 2014-09-15
of confrontation … is an issue subject to de novo review.” State v. Bintz, 2002 WI App 204, ¶6, 257 Wis. 2d 177
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34646 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
and whether counsel’s actions prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29101 - 2014-09-15
and whether counsel’s actions prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29101 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Samuel Joseph Cole
and substantial, are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11, 270 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19096 - 2017-09-21
and substantial, are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11, 270 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19096 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and, if so, prejudicial, present questions of law that we review de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d at 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34634 - 2008-11-17
and, if so, prejudicial, present questions of law that we review de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d at 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34634 - 2008-11-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
additional facts as needed below. Discussion ¶6 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36614 - 2014-09-15
additional facts as needed below. Discussion ¶6 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36614 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. State v. Cobbs, 221 Wis. 2d 101, 105, 584 N.W.2d 709 (Ct. App. 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316528 - 2020-12-22
of law that we review de novo. State v. Cobbs, 221 Wis. 2d 101, 105, 584 N.W.2d 709 (Ct. App. 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316528 - 2020-12-22
[PDF]
James A. Mentek, Jr. v. David H. Schwarz
of counsel is a question of law we review de novo. Cf. State v. Pultz, 206 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15028 - 2017-09-21
of counsel is a question of law we review de novo. Cf. State v. Pultz, 206 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15028 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Douglass H. Bartley v. Tommy G. Thompson
). Because the question presented is one of law, we review the trial court's decision de novo. Williams v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8307 - 2017-09-19
). Because the question presented is one of law, we review the trial court's decision de novo. Williams v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8307 - 2017-09-19