Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27291 - 27300 of 29823 for des.
Search results 27291 - 27300 of 29823 for des.
WI App 126 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP707 Complete Title ...
640 (Ct. App. 1998). We apply these standards de novo to the Common Council’s decision, reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68147 - 2013-04-23
640 (Ct. App. 1998). We apply these standards de novo to the Common Council’s decision, reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68147 - 2013-04-23
Trinity Evangelical Lutheran Church and School-Freistadt v. Tower Insurance Company
of the jury. Jacque, 209 Wis. 2d at 626. However, we apply a de novo standard of review when passing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3925 - 2005-03-31
of the jury. Jacque, 209 Wis. 2d at 626. However, we apply a de novo standard of review when passing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3925 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 8, 2005 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
on a violation of the statutory time limits of § 48.422(2), is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20175 - 2007-01-24
on a violation of the statutory time limits of § 48.422(2), is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20175 - 2007-01-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for judgment notwithstanding the verdict de novo, applying the same standards as the [circuit] court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169839 - 2017-09-21
for judgment notwithstanding the verdict de novo, applying the same standards as the [circuit] court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169839 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Lubinski v. Lubinski, 2008 WI App 151, ¶5, 314 Wis. 2d 395, 761 N.W.2d 676. ¶16 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399172 - 2021-07-27
de novo. Lubinski v. Lubinski, 2008 WI App 151, ¶5, 314 Wis. 2d 395, 761 N.W.2d 676. ¶16 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399172 - 2021-07-27
[PDF]
Wangard Partners, Inc. v. Gerald Graf
interpretation and application to a set of facts present questions of law for de novo review). When we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25241 - 2017-09-21
interpretation and application to a set of facts present questions of law for de novo review). When we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25241 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Thomas W. Koeppen
of a prior conviction must be a direct and specific admission by the defendant). We apply a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15136 - 2017-09-21
of a prior conviction must be a direct and specific admission by the defendant). We apply a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15136 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Leon M. Reyes v. Greatway Insurance Company
reviews de novo. State v. Bodoh, No. 97-0495-CR, op. at 4 (S. Ct. June 18, 1999); Manor v. Hanson
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17272 - 2017-09-21
reviews de novo. State v. Bodoh, No. 97-0495-CR, op. at 4 (S. Ct. June 18, 1999); Manor v. Hanson
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17272 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Thomas R. Ward v. Town of Nashville
(Ct. App. 1990) (implicitly applying de novo review to issue whether judgment was final), overruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2481 - 2017-09-19
(Ct. App. 1990) (implicitly applying de novo review to issue whether judgment was final), overruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2481 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue de novo. Id. ¶24 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149221 - 2017-09-21
discretion because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue de novo. Id. ¶24 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149221 - 2017-09-21