Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2731 - 2740 of 17366 for Cost.
Search results 2731 - 2740 of 17366 for Cost.
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kimberly A. Theobald
and payment of $3289.51 in costs. ¶2 We approve the findings and conclusions and determine that Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16794 - 2017-09-21
and payment of $3289.51 in costs. ¶2 We approve the findings and conclusions and determine that Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16794 - 2017-09-21
Steve Kuski v. Jeremiah George
, because the trial court properly determined that the underlying defense was frivolous, we award costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3166 - 2005-03-31
, because the trial court properly determined that the underlying defense was frivolous, we award costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3166 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
pay the costs of this proceeding. ¶2 Because no appeal has been filed, we review the referee's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54058 - 2010-09-02
pay the costs of this proceeding. ¶2 Because no appeal has been filed, we review the referee's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54058 - 2010-09-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that he had been unemployed since November 2008 and that he had “no money to defray the costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90905 - 2014-09-15
that he had been unemployed since November 2008 and that he had “no money to defray the costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90905 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
reprimand Attorney Howard B. Mitz for professional misconduct and order him to pay the full costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139097 - 2017-09-21
reprimand Attorney Howard B. Mitz for professional misconduct and order him to pay the full costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139097 - 2017-09-21
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Ronald W. Hendree
for reinstatement. Furthermore, we direct that the costs of the reinstatement proceedings, which are $6123.29
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20056 - 2005-10-20
for reinstatement. Furthermore, we direct that the costs of the reinstatement proceedings, which are $6123.29
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20056 - 2005-10-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Slocum’s access to the court system until he paid the accumulated frivolous cost assessments against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186257 - 2017-09-21
Slocum’s access to the court system until he paid the accumulated frivolous cost assessments against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186257 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
David K. Kalan v. City of St. Francis
K. Kalan appeals pro se from an order dismissing his complaint and assessing costs for pursuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8726 - 2017-09-19
K. Kalan appeals pro se from an order dismissing his complaint and assessing costs for pursuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8726 - 2017-09-19
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kimberly A. Theobald
of $3289.51 in costs. ¶2 We approve the findings and conclusions and determine that Attorney Theobald's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16794 - 2005-03-31
of $3289.51 in costs. ¶2 We approve the findings and conclusions and determine that Attorney Theobald's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16794 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The agreement and the QDRO do not address allocating any premium cost. Ed has been paying the survivor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136022 - 2017-09-21
. The agreement and the QDRO do not address allocating any premium cost. Ed has been paying the survivor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136022 - 2017-09-21