Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2731 - 2740 of 82690 for case code.
Search results 2731 - 2740 of 82690 for case code.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a contract, statute, or administrative code is a question of law we review de novo. See Boelter v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173219 - 2017-09-21
of a contract, statute, or administrative code is a question of law we review de novo. See Boelter v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173219 - 2017-09-21
Sheri Klein v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
2003 WI App 118 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-1927 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5486 - 2005-03-31
2003 WI App 118 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-1927 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5486 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the percentage standard to “gross income.” Id., ¶26; see Wis. Stat. § 767.59(2)(a); Wis. Admin. Code § DCF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83228 - 2012-06-04
the percentage standard to “gross income.” Id., ¶26; see Wis. Stat. § 767.59(2)(a); Wis. Admin. Code § DCF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83228 - 2012-06-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, WIS., MUNICIPAL CODE § 27.13(1) (1997) (“No person other than cemetery employees or other police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601184 - 2022-12-21
, WIS., MUNICIPAL CODE § 27.13(1) (1997) (“No person other than cemetery employees or other police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601184 - 2022-12-21
[PDF]
State v. Amany E.
to the new Juvenile Code, ch. 938. The court reasoned that because a dismissal under the cited provision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2244 - 2017-09-19
to the new Juvenile Code, ch. 938. The court reasoned that because a dismissal under the cited provision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2244 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128512 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128512 - 2017-09-21
State v. Amany E.
be a “vestigial organ” which the legislature inadvertently carried over from ch. 48 to the new Juvenile Code, ch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2244 - 2005-03-31
be a “vestigial organ” which the legislature inadvertently carried over from ch. 48 to the new Juvenile Code, ch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2244 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. John Husz
the Wisconsin Administrative Code, Chapter PAC 1 entitled “PAROLE PROCEDURE,” and more particularly, PAC 1.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13421 - 2017-09-21
the Wisconsin Administrative Code, Chapter PAC 1 entitled “PAROLE PROCEDURE,” and more particularly, PAC 1.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13421 - 2017-09-21
State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. John Husz
) (emphasis added). Similarly, when we examine the Wisconsin Administrative Code, Chapter PAC 1 entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13421 - 2005-03-31
) (emphasis added). Similarly, when we examine the Wisconsin Administrative Code, Chapter PAC 1 entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13421 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
code language, we conclude that the circuit court did not err in denying Northside’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241317 - 2019-06-04
code language, we conclude that the circuit court did not err in denying Northside’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241317 - 2019-06-04