Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2731 - 2740 of 83216 for case code.
Search results 2731 - 2740 of 83216 for case code.
[PDF]
LMMIA, LLC v. State of Wisconsin, Division of Hearings and Appeals
. This case concerns the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) denial of LMMIA’s permit application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25716 - 2017-09-21
. This case concerns the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) denial of LMMIA’s permit application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25716 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the percentage standard to “gross income.” Id., ¶26; see Wis. Stat. § 767.59(2)(a); Wis. Admin. Code § DCF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83228 - 2012-06-04
the percentage standard to “gross income.” Id., ¶26; see Wis. Stat. § 767.59(2)(a); Wis. Admin. Code § DCF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83228 - 2012-06-04
LMMIA, LLC v. State of Wisconsin, Division of Hearings and Appeals
., Dykman and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J. This case concerns the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25716 - 2006-06-28
., Dykman and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J. This case concerns the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25716 - 2006-06-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
discern them. Rhoades’s statements of the case and the facts, sometimes supported by record citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110488 - 2017-09-21
discern them. Rhoades’s statements of the case and the facts, sometimes supported by record citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110488 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, WIS., MUNICIPAL CODE § 27.13(1) (1997) (“No person other than cemetery employees or other police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601184 - 2022-12-21
, WIS., MUNICIPAL CODE § 27.13(1) (1997) (“No person other than cemetery employees or other police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601184 - 2022-12-21
State v. Amany E.
be a “vestigial organ” which the legislature inadvertently carried over from ch. 48 to the new Juvenile Code, ch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2244 - 2005-03-31
be a “vestigial organ” which the legislature inadvertently carried over from ch. 48 to the new Juvenile Code, ch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2244 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128512 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128512 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Amany E.
to the new Juvenile Code, ch. 938. The court reasoned that because a dismissal under the cited provision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2244 - 2017-09-19
to the new Juvenile Code, ch. 938. The court reasoned that because a dismissal under the cited provision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2244 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
code language, we conclude that the circuit court did not err in denying Northside’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241317 - 2019-06-04
code language, we conclude that the circuit court did not err in denying Northside’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241317 - 2019-06-04
State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. John Husz
) (emphasis added). Similarly, when we examine the Wisconsin Administrative Code, Chapter PAC 1 entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13421 - 2005-03-31
) (emphasis added). Similarly, when we examine the Wisconsin Administrative Code, Chapter PAC 1 entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13421 - 2005-03-31