Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2731 - 2740 of 83820 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 2731 - 2740 of 83820 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
and not a financing arrangement, a fee simple deed was utilized, and a transfer tax return indicated the sale price
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55425 - 2014-09-15
and not a financing arrangement, a fee simple deed was utilized, and a transfer tax return indicated the sale price
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55425 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and not a financing arrangement, a fee simple deed was utilized, and a transfer tax return indicated the sale price
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55425 - 2010-10-12
and not a financing arrangement, a fee simple deed was utilized, and a transfer tax return indicated the sale price
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55425 - 2010-10-12
State v. Cassandra Crawford
charge. The facts were simple and straightforward. She attempted to steal a telephone from Shopko
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13454 - 2005-03-31
charge. The facts were simple and straightforward. She attempted to steal a telephone from Shopko
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13454 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Cassandra Crawford
charge. The facts were simple and straightforward. She attempted to steal a telephone from Shopko
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13454 - 2017-09-21
charge. The facts were simple and straightforward. She attempted to steal a telephone from Shopko
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13454 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Sara V.
, and NANCY E. WHEELER, Judge. Orders reversed. BROWN, J. In this CHIPS case, Sara V. alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9654 - 2017-09-19
, and NANCY E. WHEELER, Judge. Orders reversed. BROWN, J. In this CHIPS case, Sara V. alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9654 - 2017-09-19
Richard I. Wang, M.D. v. gan Ivankovic
¶2 This case arises from a small claims collection action in which Dr. Wang
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7539 - 2005-03-31
¶2 This case arises from a small claims collection action in which Dr. Wang
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7539 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sara V.
. In this CHIPS case, Sara V. alleges that the trial court erred when it made comments to the jury suggesting how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9654 - 2005-03-31
. In this CHIPS case, Sara V. alleges that the trial court erred when it made comments to the jury suggesting how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9654 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Erica S.
SIMANEK, Judge. Affirmed. No. 00-2110 2 ¶1 BROWN, P.J.1 The issue in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2884 - 2017-09-19
SIMANEK, Judge. Affirmed. No. 00-2110 2 ¶1 BROWN, P.J.1 The issue in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2884 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Richard I. Wang, M.D. v. gan Ivankovic
. Wang, this court affirms. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises from a small claims collection action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7539 - 2017-09-19
. Wang, this court affirms. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises from a small claims collection action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7539 - 2017-09-19
State v. Erica S.
BROWN, P.J.[1] The issue in this case is whether a time deadline of reasonableness should be read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2884 - 2005-03-31
BROWN, P.J.[1] The issue in this case is whether a time deadline of reasonableness should be read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2884 - 2005-03-31