Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27301 - 27310 of 74457 for a ha.

State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
conclude, however, that Rychtik has not demonstrated a new factor. ¶8 To be a new factor, Rychtik’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4658 - 2005-03-31

State v. James D. Minniecheske
. Minniecheske also has no basis to challenge his almost $5,400 restitution obligation. The trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12044 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. The State submits that Blunt has no right to appeal from the order denying his motion to reconsider because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107362 - 2014-01-27

COURT OF APPEALS
Whether the County has met its burden is a mixed question of fact and law. This court will not disturb
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138426 - 2015-03-25

[PDF] CA Blank Order
You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184924 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Electronic Notice You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708350 - 2023-10-03

[PDF] CA Blank Order
notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2014AP2779-CR State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149075 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Corr. Inst. P.O. Box 925 Redgranite, WI 54970-0925 You are hereby notified that the Court has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187497 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Charles R. Seibel
, and not guilty on the PAC charge. Seibel appeals the OWI conviction. DISCUSSION ¶7 The trial court has broad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6857 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
that “the State has failed to establish that a qualified person under [WIS. STAT. § 343.305(5)(b)] has drawn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58686 - 2014-09-15