Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27311 - 27320 of 83344 for case search.
Search results 27311 - 27320 of 83344 for case search.
State Public Defender v. Circuit Court for Fond Du Lac County
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8248 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8248 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
appeals from a judgment dismissing the negligence case she filed against her landlord, Timothy Kilps
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55309 - 2014-09-15
appeals from a judgment dismissing the negligence case she filed against her landlord, Timothy Kilps
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55309 - 2014-09-15
2006 WI APP 218
2006 WI App 218 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP2644 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26563 - 2006-10-30
2006 WI App 218 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP2644 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26563 - 2006-10-30
[PDF]
Richard G. Bedessem v. Donna J. Bedessem
division, remanding the case to the circuit court for reconsideration of other determinations—including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14034 - 2014-09-15
division, remanding the case to the circuit court for reconsideration of other determinations—including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14034 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to disappointment in his sentence; (4) the issue is of statewide importance because there are no published cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682853 - 2023-07-25
to disappointment in his sentence; (4) the issue is of statewide importance because there are no published cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682853 - 2023-07-25
[PDF]
State v. Mitchel P.
said, he said” case. Picking up on that theme, we portray Mitchel’s argument in the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19537 - 2017-09-21
said, he said” case. Picking up on that theme, we portray Mitchel’s argument in the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19537 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
verdict of acquittal following presentation of the State’s case and should not have instructed the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54574 - 2014-09-15
verdict of acquittal following presentation of the State’s case and should not have instructed the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54574 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for continuing to do so in the future. The court then stated: This is possibly the first case I’ve seen where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43710 - 2009-11-18
for continuing to do so in the future. The court then stated: This is possibly the first case I’ve seen where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43710 - 2009-11-18
[PDF]
State v. Susan M. Curtis
cause for arrest.” Id. at 316. ¶9 The question in this case is whether the facts observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2939 - 2017-09-19
cause for arrest.” Id. at 316. ¶9 The question in this case is whether the facts observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2939 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of the State’s case and should not have instructed the jury on provocation. Kubat further asserts he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54574 - 2010-09-22
of the State’s case and should not have instructed the jury on provocation. Kubat further asserts he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54574 - 2010-09-22