Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27311 - 27320 of 29713 for des.
Search results 27311 - 27320 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant to relief” is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion raises such facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982381 - 2025-07-15
the defendant to relief” is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion raises such facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982381 - 2025-07-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
records law … and has applied that law to undisputed facts, we review the circuit court’s decision de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121627 - 2014-09-16
records law … and has applied that law to undisputed facts, we review the circuit court’s decision de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121627 - 2014-09-16
State v. Antoine D. Edwards
facts that, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21736 - 2006-03-13
facts that, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21736 - 2006-03-13
[PDF]
Susan Hatleberg v. Norwest Bank Wisconsin
, which this court reviews de novo. Stephenson v. Universal Metrics, Inc., 2002 WI 30, ¶15, 251 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18925 - 2017-09-21
, which this court reviews de novo. Stephenson v. Universal Metrics, Inc., 2002 WI 30, ¶15, 251 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18925 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we determine de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. ¶15 Martinez fails to demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181349 - 2017-09-21
of law we determine de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. ¶15 Martinez fails to demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181349 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. II. Application Of Standards To Wilcox’s Ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29101 - 2007-05-16
are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. II. Application Of Standards To Wilcox’s Ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29101 - 2007-05-16
State v. Aaron T. Hicks
and prejudicial are questions of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id. Since a defendant must show both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3473 - 2005-03-31
and prejudicial are questions of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id. Since a defendant must show both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3473 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 12
; see also WIS. STAT. § 227.57(11). ¶11 Our de novo review begins with the language of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255002 - 2020-04-27
; see also WIS. STAT. § 227.57(11). ¶11 Our de novo review begins with the language of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255002 - 2020-04-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
and whether counsel’s actions prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29101 - 2014-09-15
and whether counsel’s actions prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29101 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
. We review conclusions of law de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54030 - 2010-08-31
. We review conclusions of law de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54030 - 2010-08-31