Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27321 - 27330 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 27321 - 27330 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422418 - 2021-09-08
his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422418 - 2021-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for plea withdrawal. We conclude that Hashim failed to make the necessary showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66673 - 2011-06-28
motion for plea withdrawal. We conclude that Hashim failed to make the necessary showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66673 - 2011-06-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
challenges the circuit court’s decision denying his suppression motion. He argues that the officer who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28953 - 2014-09-15
challenges the circuit court’s decision denying his suppression motion. He argues that the officer who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28953 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
: MICHAEL G. MALMSTADT and michael b. brennan, Judges.[1] Affirmed, motion granted, and cause remanded. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29562 - 2007-07-02
: MICHAEL G. MALMSTADT and michael b. brennan, Judges.[1] Affirmed, motion granted, and cause remanded. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29562 - 2007-07-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of eight criminal counts and an order denying his postconviction motion. Wajer argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155629 - 2017-09-21
of eight criminal counts and an order denying his postconviction motion. Wajer argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155629 - 2017-09-21
Carol Gonzales v. Kenosha County
the judgment entered against them. The appellants argue that the circuit erred when it denied their motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20892 - 2006-01-10
the judgment entered against them. The appellants argue that the circuit erred when it denied their motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20892 - 2006-01-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
2 motion to dismiss. He contends that the officer failed to use audible and visual signals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30881 - 2014-09-15
2 motion to dismiss. He contends that the officer failed to use audible and visual signals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30881 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The circuit court set a hearing on the motion for August 1, 2012, but had to reset the hearing because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128263 - 2017-09-21
. The circuit court set a hearing on the motion for August 1, 2012, but had to reset the hearing because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128263 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2021AP1863-FT 2 denying his motion to dismiss Ann Jahimiak’s motion for a hearing de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=538371 - 2022-06-30
. No. 2021AP1863-FT 2 denying his motion to dismiss Ann Jahimiak’s motion for a hearing de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=538371 - 2022-06-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion for plea withdrawal. Based upon our review of the briefs No. 2018AP2157-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=321555 - 2021-01-12
postconviction motion for plea withdrawal. Based upon our review of the briefs No. 2018AP2157-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=321555 - 2021-01-12