Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27321 - 27330 of 29713 for des.

State v. Aaron T. Hicks
and prejudicial are questions of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id. Since a defendant must show both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3473 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 12
; see also WIS. STAT. § 227.57(11). ¶11 Our de novo review begins with the language of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255002 - 2020-04-27

[PDF] NOTICE
and whether counsel’s actions prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29101 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
. We review conclusions of law de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54030 - 2010-08-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Inglimo, 2007 WI 126, ¶5, 305 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318638 - 2020-12-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. State v. Cobbs, 221 Wis. 2d 101, 105, 584 N.W.2d 709 (Ct. App. 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316528 - 2020-12-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the deficient performance prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶¶38-39
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887928 - 2024-12-10

COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36614 - 2009-05-27

State v. Brian Hibl
facts. Id. This review presents a question of law for our de novo review, but we benefit from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19755 - 2005-10-27

[PDF] NOTICE
, prejudicial, present questions of law that we review de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d at 128. Finally, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34634 - 2014-09-15