Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27331 - 27340 of 69007 for had.
Search results 27331 - 27340 of 69007 for had.
State v. Dean P. Lenz
reasonable suspicion to make an investigatory stop. We conclude the deputy had the requisite reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15246 - 2005-03-31
reasonable suspicion to make an investigatory stop. We conclude the deputy had the requisite reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15246 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by the injunction; and (3) Hudacek’s awareness in April 2022 that the injunction had been issued and was valid
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958252 - 2025-05-20
by the injunction; and (3) Hudacek’s awareness in April 2022 that the injunction had been issued and was valid
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958252 - 2025-05-20
Wisconsin Court System - Third Branch eNews
a conversation with a colleague in the legal profession who recognized the symptoms. Judge Guy D. Dutcher “We had
/news/thirdbranch/may23/dutcher.htm - 2026-02-21
a conversation with a colleague in the legal profession who recognized the symptoms. Judge Guy D. Dutcher “We had
/news/thirdbranch/may23/dutcher.htm - 2026-02-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and another man accompanied Dontae Phiffer to the home of the homicide victim, with whom Phiffer had been
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020949 - 2025-10-09
and another man accompanied Dontae Phiffer to the home of the homicide victim, with whom Phiffer had been
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020949 - 2025-10-09
State v. Deshawn L. Harris
the real controversy had not been fully tried. This court rejects Harris’s arguments on these issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11432 - 2005-03-31
the real controversy had not been fully tried. This court rejects Harris’s arguments on these issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11432 - 2005-03-31
Waushara County v. Richard Mack
court lacked jurisdiction; and (3) the trial court had jurisdiction to decide Mack's counterclaim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8019 - 2005-03-31
court lacked jurisdiction; and (3) the trial court had jurisdiction to decide Mack's counterclaim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8019 - 2005-03-31
Steve Uselmann v. Shawn Klinzing
. Klinzing filed a counterclaim alleging that Uselmann had breached the contract by constructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24798 - 2006-04-11
. Klinzing filed a counterclaim alleging that Uselmann had breached the contract by constructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24798 - 2006-04-11
Robert J. Probst v. Winnebago County
.” Probst and Accord had previously filed an action naming the same defendants[1] in federal district court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10275 - 2008-10-14
.” Probst and Accord had previously filed an action naming the same defendants[1] in federal district court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10275 - 2008-10-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Charles’ examination, he testified that he had visited Ethan within the last three months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69194 - 2014-09-15
Charles’ examination, he testified that he had visited Ethan within the last three months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69194 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 56
— that is, injuries “over and above those he would have sustained had his driver’s seat not failed.” ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581139 - 2022-12-27
— that is, injuries “over and above those he would have sustained had his driver’s seat not failed.” ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581139 - 2022-12-27