Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27351 - 27360 of 84008 for case number.
Search results 27351 - 27360 of 84008 for case number.
[PDF]
State v. Debra Noble
2002 WI 64 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 99-3271-CR COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17583 - 2017-09-21
2002 WI 64 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 99-3271-CR COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17583 - 2017-09-21
State v. Hayes Johnson
v. Hayes Johnson, case number F94-3955. Attached please find the State’s Brief in Opposition
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17259 - 2005-03-31
v. Hayes Johnson, case number F94-3955. Attached please find the State’s Brief in Opposition
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17259 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
issues in the case. Additional hearings took place on December 15, 2020, and January 8 and February 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992754 - 2025-08-05
issues in the case. Additional hearings took place on December 15, 2020, and January 8 and February 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992754 - 2025-08-05
[PDF]
State v. Carlos Perez
2001 WI 79 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 99-3108-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17572 - 2017-09-21
2001 WI 79 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 99-3108-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17572 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
-04).[1] The case was originally scheduled for a jury trial, then changed to a projected guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27039 - 2006-11-06
-04).[1] The case was originally scheduled for a jury trial, then changed to a projected guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27039 - 2006-11-06
COURT OF APPEALS
of review that apply to non-arbitration divorce cases, may create questions as to what standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89357 - 2012-11-14
of review that apply to non-arbitration divorce cases, may create questions as to what standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89357 - 2012-11-14
COURT OF APPEALS
in its role in securing the policies. ¶9 The case went to trial. After the presentation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74656 - 2011-11-30
in its role in securing the policies. ¶9 The case went to trial. After the presentation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74656 - 2011-11-30
COURT OF APPEALS
of review that apply to non-arbitration divorce cases, may create questions as to what standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89355 - 2012-11-14
of review that apply to non-arbitration divorce cases, may create questions as to what standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89355 - 2012-11-14
[PDF]
Steven Van Erden v. Joseph A. Sobczak
2004 WI App 40 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-1595
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5362 - 2017-09-19
2004 WI App 40 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-1595
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5362 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
to WIS. STAT. § 948.02(1) (2003-04).1 The case was originally scheduled for a jury trial, then changed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27039 - 2014-09-15
to WIS. STAT. § 948.02(1) (2003-04).1 The case was originally scheduled for a jury trial, then changed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27039 - 2014-09-15