Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27351 - 27360 of 46101 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 27351 - 27360 of 46101 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
there. No. 2023AP884-CR 3 Deputy Breister proceeded to administer multiple field sobriety tests. After Mapes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903888 - 2025-01-22
there. No. 2023AP884-CR 3 Deputy Breister proceeded to administer multiple field sobriety tests. After Mapes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903888 - 2025-01-22
State v. Ruth E. Peterson
failed field sobriety tests and Funk arrested her for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7624 - 2005-03-31
failed field sobriety tests and Funk arrested her for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7624 - 2005-03-31
State v. Craig Shelton Hayes
with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion." The test is objective: [T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13234 - 2005-03-31
with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion." The test is objective: [T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13234 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
to constitutional principles. Id. What constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33774 - 2014-09-15
to constitutional principles. Id. What constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33774 - 2014-09-15
William Putze v. Thomas A. Ernstmeyer, Jr.
that the trial court erred because the test is not whether he met his burden of proof or persuasion, but whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8830 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred because the test is not whether he met his burden of proof or persuasion, but whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8830 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
no reason, to believe the court would have allowed the CHIPS testimony if counsel had further tested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173441 - 2017-09-21
no reason, to believe the court would have allowed the CHIPS testimony if counsel had further tested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173441 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John S. Troyer
, 401 N.W.2d 759 (1985). The test for whether a person is in custody for Miranda purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6437 - 2017-09-19
, 401 N.W.2d 759 (1985). The test for whether a person is in custody for Miranda purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6437 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
for previous blood test fees, Winnebago county also advised him that his account was satisfied. In 1999, Eaton
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96557 - 2013-05-14
for previous blood test fees, Winnebago county also advised him that his account was satisfied. In 1999, Eaton
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96557 - 2013-05-14
State v. David G. Grimm
Grimm perform some field sobriety tests, which he failed. Peterson then transported him to the hospital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9124 - 2005-03-31
Grimm perform some field sobriety tests, which he failed. Peterson then transported him to the hospital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9124 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tammy E. Millerleile
). The test is whether a reasonable person in the suspect’s position would have considered himself or herself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6007 - 2005-03-31
). The test is whether a reasonable person in the suspect’s position would have considered himself or herself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6007 - 2005-03-31