Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27351 - 27360 of 64077 for records/1000.

Patricia A.M. v. Patricia S.
on facts of record, applies the proper legal standards, and uses a demonstrated rational process to reach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3212 - 2005-03-31

State v. Mark A. Denninger
Klessig, an appellate court would find a valid waiver if the record reflected a deliberate choice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5934 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was not satisfied. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105214 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. No. 2016AP1030 2 and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204368 - 2017-12-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
concerns by testifying at trial. Nothing in the record suggests the court erred in believing the citizen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97435 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=735400 - 2023-12-05

Eugene J. Fliss v. Corrine T. Fliss
. The Fliss heirs first challenge the trial court's conclusion that there was “no basis” in the record from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9057 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
it considered his sentence credit before imposing sentence. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147870 - 2015-08-30

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 16, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
reasonably based on accepted legal standards and the facts of record. See State v. Pharr, 115 Wis. 2d 334
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27162 - 2006-11-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). The findings are all supported by the record. 3 The circuit court properly concluded that claim preclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208460 - 2018-02-20