Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27361 - 27370 of 64775 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 27361 - 27370 of 64775 for divorce records/1000.
State v. James L. Kirk
. The record belies this claim. Kirk’s attorney made a demand for discovery and acknowledged that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6644 - 2005-03-31
. The record belies this claim. Kirk’s attorney made a demand for discovery and acknowledged that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6644 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William J. Perry
the trial court of additional, accurate information about Perry's criminal record. Therefore, we affirm.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9732 - 2017-09-19
the trial court of additional, accurate information about Perry's criminal record. Therefore, we affirm.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9732 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
her counterclaims and third-party claims against it. Based on our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132050 - 2017-09-21
her counterclaims and third-party claims against it. Based on our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132050 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378212 - 2021-06-17
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378212 - 2021-06-17
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Maldonado
a response. No. 95-3047-CR-NM -2- After an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9914 - 2017-09-19
a response. No. 95-3047-CR-NM -2- After an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9914 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270034 - 2020-07-22
consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270034 - 2020-07-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to show an unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence at issue. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70535 - 2014-09-15
to show an unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence at issue. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70535 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109922 - 2014-04-08
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109922 - 2014-04-08
COURT OF APPEALS
dismissed as an untimely certiorari action. The Board pointed out that the record did not include any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112630 - 2014-05-19
dismissed as an untimely certiorari action. The Board pointed out that the record did not include any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112630 - 2014-05-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290961 - 2020-09-29
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290961 - 2020-09-29