Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27361 - 27370 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.

[PDF] Mark Johnson (Deceased) v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
place statute to this case as a matter of law,” LIRC’s decision “failed to specifically address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13012 - 2017-09-21

Ozaukee County v. Perry P. Lieuallen
, the County of Ozaukee also had the burden of submitting evidence in its case-in-chief showing that alcohol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15346 - 2005-03-31

State v. Larry W. Norris
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2158
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11171 - 2005-03-31

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Debra J.A.
was out of town, but the attorney who had been appointed to represent her in her CHIPS cases appeared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2189 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI 21
2013 WI 21 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2012AP2318-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93148 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and pursuant to the policy underlying WIS. STAT. RULE 809.86(4), we refer to the victim in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1035873 - 2025-11-11

Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Lucille S.
, the cases were scheduled for a jury trial on January 8, 2001. Prior to the jury trial, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3920 - 2005-03-31

Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Lucille S.
, the cases were scheduled for a jury trial on January 8, 2001. Prior to the jury trial, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3921 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Little Sissabagama Lake Shore Owners Association, Inc. v. Town of Edgewater
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1800 For Complete Title of Case, see attached opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11012 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was unconstitutional, and “an order vacating the judgment entered [in the 2013 tax foreclosure case].” The parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216067 - 2018-07-24