Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27371 - 27380 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 27371 - 27380 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
, Katrina, and by denying his subsequent motion for a mistrial. We conclude that, assuming the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51343 - 2010-06-23
, Katrina, and by denying his subsequent motion for a mistrial. We conclude that, assuming the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51343 - 2010-06-23
COURT OF APPEALS
offense. Johnson argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47834 - 2010-03-10
offense. Johnson argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47834 - 2010-03-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress. The court ruled that the state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72524 - 2014-09-15
argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress. The court ruled that the state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72524 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
offense. Cushman argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress. The court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72524 - 2011-10-19
offense. Cushman argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress. The court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72524 - 2011-10-19
[PDF]
Elaine Wysocki v. Town of Kronenwetter
, the Town filed motions seeking dismissal of the claims because the Wysockis had never filed notices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3794 - 2017-09-20
, the Town filed motions seeking dismissal of the claims because the Wysockis had never filed notices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3794 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
convicting him of disorderly conduct and an order denying his motion for a new trial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121951 - 2014-09-18
convicting him of disorderly conduct and an order denying his motion for a new trial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121951 - 2014-09-18
[PDF]
Rohini Avvaru v. Gerald D. O'Marro
to the trial court. The Avvarus’ counsel filed motions to strike the answer as untimely and for default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11023 - 2017-09-19
to the trial court. The Avvarus’ counsel filed motions to strike the answer as untimely and for default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11023 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motions. His appellate counsel, Attorney David Malkus, filed a no-merit report pursuant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984598 - 2025-07-22
postconviction motions. His appellate counsel, Attorney David Malkus, filed a no-merit report pursuant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984598 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
State v. Sebastian Molina
postconviction motion hearing. We No. 03-0352-CR 2 deferred decision on the motion until briefing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6143 - 2017-09-19
postconviction motion hearing. We No. 03-0352-CR 2 deferred decision on the motion until briefing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6143 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prevailed. The Essers appeal the order denying their postverdict motion to set aside that verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99324 - 2014-09-15
prevailed. The Essers appeal the order denying their postverdict motion to set aside that verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99324 - 2014-09-15