Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27371 - 27380 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 27371 - 27380 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Joel L. Ritchie
his motion for a change of venue. We reject Ritchie’s arguments. We affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15766 - 2017-09-21
his motion for a change of venue. We reject Ritchie’s arguments. We affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15766 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dujuan T. Nash
] Nash also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his plea. Nash claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4392 - 2005-03-31
] Nash also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his plea. Nash claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4392 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 55
; and determine and impose appropriate discipline. The court, on its own motion, may order the parties to file
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82876 - 2014-09-15
; and determine and impose appropriate discipline. The court, on its own motion, may order the parties to file
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82876 - 2014-09-15
State v. Joel L. Ritchie
, Ritchie argues that the trial court erred by rejecting his motion for a change of venue. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15766 - 2005-03-31
, Ritchie argues that the trial court erred by rejecting his motion for a change of venue. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15766 - 2005-03-31
Sherri Korntved v. Advanced Healthcare
motion, forbidding the access of patients’ medical records for non-work related purposes. Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19040 - 2005-09-19
motion, forbidding the access of patients’ medical records for non-work related purposes. Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19040 - 2005-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
filing a motion for summary judgment on grounds that the alleged misrepresentations were not actionable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35945 - 2009-05-11
filing a motion for summary judgment on grounds that the alleged misrepresentations were not actionable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35945 - 2009-05-11
[PDF]
Christopher J. Keller v. James R. Kraft
. James R. Kraft and the City of Milwaukee appeal from an order denying their motion seeking summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17650 - 2017-09-21
. James R. Kraft and the City of Milwaukee appeal from an order denying their motion seeking summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17650 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
., Fine and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 CURLEY, P.J. James Matson appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100036 - 2013-07-29
., Fine and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 CURLEY, P.J. James Matson appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100036 - 2013-07-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel after briefing was complete. We granted his subsequent motion for leave to file a supplemental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=844624 - 2024-09-04
counsel after briefing was complete. We granted his subsequent motion for leave to file a supplemental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=844624 - 2024-09-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying Matson’s motion to enforce the judgment. The judgment Matson sought to enforce, a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100036 - 2017-09-21
denying Matson’s motion to enforce the judgment. The judgment Matson sought to enforce, a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100036 - 2017-09-21