Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27381 - 27390 of 30191 for de.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s performance is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. Jeannie M.P
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83298 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Mary E. Fazio v. Department of Employee Trust Funds
de novo, see Hensley, 2001 WI 105 at ¶6; however, we benefit in our review from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4422 - 2017-09-19

2009 WI APP 58
decisions de novo, using the same well-known methodology as the circuit court. See Lambrecht v. Estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36092 - 2009-05-26

State v. Jason R. Dixon
review de novo. State v. Groth, 2002 WI App 299, ¶21, ___Wis. 2d ___, 655 N.W.2d 163. A defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5327 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
to a given set of facts, which presents a question of law for our de novo review. See Waukesha County v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36329 - 2009-04-29

[PDF] Central Corporation v. Research Products Corporation
it is depleted. Research further argues that Central's use of its logo or trademark is de minimus, since
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16651 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Robert L. Von Haden, Jr.
which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification, however, presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7060 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI 108
of law de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54030 - 2014-09-15

Delores Sawyer v. Berit H. Midelfort, M.D.
of law, id. at 434, 556 N.W.2d at 399, which we review de novo, State v. Irish, 210 Wis.2d 107, 110, 565
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12725 - 2005-03-31

Forest County v. Wesley S. Goode
meaning of the statute. The construction of a statute or ordinance is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11844 - 2005-03-31