Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27391 - 27400 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 27391 - 27400 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(“Froedtert South”). As relevant to this appeal, the circuit court had granted a motion precluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098581 - 2026-03-31
(“Froedtert South”). As relevant to this appeal, the circuit court had granted a motion precluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098581 - 2026-03-31
[PDF]
Milwaukee Women's Medical Service, Inc. v. Joseph Scheidler
, JJ. WEDEMEYER, P.J. Joseph Scheidler appeals from a trial court order granting the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13915 - 2014-09-15
, JJ. WEDEMEYER, P.J. Joseph Scheidler appeals from a trial court order granting the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13915 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Austin argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because it based its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86046 - 2014-09-15
. Austin argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because it based its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86046 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the State’s motion to consolidate Woods’s four cases for trial over Woods’s objection. The court inquired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069279 - 2026-01-28
the State’s motion to consolidate Woods’s four cases for trial over Woods’s objection. The court inquired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069279 - 2026-01-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
David’s motion to re-open the default judgment. In the alternative, David argues that counsel provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30305 - 2014-09-15
David’s motion to re-open the default judgment. In the alternative, David argues that counsel provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30305 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
at the grounds hearing and erred when it denied David’s motion to re-open the default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30305 - 2007-09-17
at the grounds hearing and erred when it denied David’s motion to re-open the default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30305 - 2007-09-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for postconviction relief. We affirm both. ¶2 Sisters SMM and SPM, ages fourteen and sixteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239398 - 2019-04-24
motion for postconviction relief. We affirm both. ¶2 Sisters SMM and SPM, ages fourteen and sixteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239398 - 2019-04-24
[PDF]
WI APP 227
and the circuit court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that: (1) his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30367 - 2014-09-15
and the circuit court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that: (1) his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30367 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
motion to sever the sixteen-charged counts into two separate trials; and (2) allowed other-acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33051 - 2014-09-15
motion to sever the sixteen-charged counts into two separate trials; and (2) allowed other-acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33051 - 2014-09-15
State v. Robert D. Stewart
hearing, Stewart filed a pro se motion to withdraw his guilty plea. At the sentencing hearing, Stewart’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3594 - 2005-03-31
hearing, Stewart filed a pro se motion to withdraw his guilty plea. At the sentencing hearing, Stewart’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3594 - 2005-03-31