Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27391 - 27400 of 30072 for de.

[PDF] WI APP 43
is available to him is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Pozo, 2002 WI App 279, ¶6, 258 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109387 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 8
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Phelps v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wis., Inc., 2009 WI 74, ¶36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131917 - 2017-09-21

Sinora Glenn v. Michael T. Plante, M.D.
is a question of law, which we review de novo. Alt, 224 Wis. 2d at 84. See also Vultaggio v. Yasko, 215 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16630 - 2005-03-31

State v. Richard A. Dodson
question that this court reviews de novo. State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶5, 237 Wis. 2d 709, 616 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4941 - 2005-03-31

City of Milwaukee v. Michelle M. Burnette
judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2955 - 2005-03-31

State v. Robert L. Von Haden, Jr.
which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification, however, presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7060 - 2005-03-31

Neil S. Hubbard v. Shaun Messer
of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Angela M.W. v. Kruzicki, 209 Wis. 2d 112, 121, 561 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16642 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
achieved.’” Id. (quoted source omitted). Whether a case is moot is a question of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208108 - 2018-02-02

[PDF] WI App 147
confirmation of the accuracy of what he told the officers was de minimis—the jury would have still heard what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72631 - 2014-09-15

Elizabeth J. Kohl v. DeWitt Ross & Stevens
.…” The construction of a statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Fox v. Catholic Knights Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19283 - 2005-09-19