Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27391 - 27400 of 74615 for public records.
Search results 27391 - 27400 of 74615 for public records.
State v. George A. King
“the defendant's right to adequate representation by counsel and the public's interest in the prompt and efficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8173 - 2005-03-31
“the defendant's right to adequate representation by counsel and the public's interest in the prompt and efficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8173 - 2005-03-31
Jeanne M. Lindskog v. Ronald P. Lindskog
deference. See id. at 492-93, 496 N.W.2d at 663-64. There is support in the record for the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14264 - 2005-03-31
deference. See id. at 492-93, 496 N.W.2d at 663-64. There is support in the record for the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14264 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
may order a new trial in the interest of justice if it appears from the Record that: (1) the real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35108 - 2014-09-15
may order a new trial in the interest of justice if it appears from the Record that: (1) the real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35108 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
recording of that interview. The tape was not played during trial, and Christina did not testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97907 - 2014-09-15
recording of that interview. The tape was not played during trial, and Christina did not testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97907 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35561 - 2009-02-17
allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35561 - 2009-02-17
William C. Anderson v. John Mogenson
of fact unless they are unsupported by the record and are therefore clearly erroneous. See § 805.17(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14384 - 2005-03-31
of fact unless they are unsupported by the record and are therefore clearly erroneous. See § 805.17(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14384 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Randolph S. Guenterberg
(1995). 2 The record contains references to the warrantless search of Guenterberg's home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9030 - 2017-09-19
(1995). 2 The record contains references to the warrantless search of Guenterberg's home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9030 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 6 We note that there is no record of this case on the Wisconsin Consolidated Court Automation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252886 - 2020-01-28
. 6 We note that there is no record of this case on the Wisconsin Consolidated Court Automation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252886 - 2020-01-28
[PDF]
Mary C. Pentinmaki v. Oliver A. Pentinmaki, Jr.
in contempt of court because the record supports the court's findings. Also, the court did not err when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9059 - 2017-09-19
in contempt of court because the record supports the court's findings. Also, the court did not err when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9059 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jeanne M. Lindskog v. Ronald P. Lindskog
in the record for the circuit court’s refusal to conclude that Ronald was shirking his support obligations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14264 - 2014-09-15
in the record for the circuit court’s refusal to conclude that Ronald was shirking his support obligations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14264 - 2014-09-15