Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27391 - 27400 of 83455 for simple case search.
Search results 27391 - 27400 of 83455 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
County, had not responded to his open records request pertaining to Milwaukee Co. Case no. 2006FA6891
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=553226 - 2022-08-09
County, had not responded to his open records request pertaining to Milwaukee Co. Case no. 2006FA6891
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=553226 - 2022-08-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192374 - 2017-09-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192374 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
denying her placement for a year or more.3 We conclude TPR warnings were not required in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27265 - 2014-09-15
denying her placement for a year or more.3 We conclude TPR warnings were not required in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27265 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Rayford N. Drake v. Linda F. Fikes
court2 stated that it was “not inclined to deny maintenance in this case, …, with this length
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10711 - 2017-09-20
court2 stated that it was “not inclined to deny maintenance in this case, …, with this length
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10711 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107896 - 2014-02-11
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107896 - 2014-02-11
[PDF]
State v. Steven E. Benash
to prove its case, and permitted the State to reopen the hearing. The State recalled Deputy Klenz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9448 - 2017-09-19
to prove its case, and permitted the State to reopen the hearing. The State recalled Deputy Klenz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9448 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 In Kenosha County Circuit Court case No. 2014CF374
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218700 - 2018-09-11
of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 In Kenosha County Circuit Court case No. 2014CF374
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218700 - 2018-09-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at No. 2020AP563-CR 2 conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378950 - 2021-06-23
at No. 2020AP563-CR 2 conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378950 - 2021-06-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and we summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=414413 - 2021-08-24
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and we summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=414413 - 2021-08-24
[PDF]
State v. Michael W. Slinker
in Sheboygan County. Subsequently, Slinker successfully appealed the Sheboygan County case; it was dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3938 - 2017-09-20
in Sheboygan County. Subsequently, Slinker successfully appealed the Sheboygan County case; it was dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3938 - 2017-09-20