Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2741 - 2750 of 44710 for part.

Jeanne G. Frawley v. Edward L. Frawley
from a judgment of the circuit court for Dunn County: LISA K. StARK, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6911 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Patrice A. Prigge v. Dennis J. Prigge
. MURPHY, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions. Before Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14842 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Hayes Industrial Brake, Inc. v. Mechanical & Industrial Fasteners, Inc.
and determining damages, we affirm. In 1991, a dispute arose between MIFAST and Hayes regarding parts which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7859 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for St. Croix County: EDWARD F. VLACK III, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33514 - 2008-07-28

Jeanne G. Frawley v. Edward L. Frawley
from a judgment of the circuit court for Dunn County: LISA K. StARK, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6910 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Timothy J. Marquardt v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
in part and remanded with directions. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18822 - 2017-09-21

James H. Dumke v.
. [1] SCR 22.28 provides, in pertinent part: Reinstatement. . . . (4) The petition for reinstatement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17251 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 3
in part; reversed in part and cause remanded. Before Neubauer, P.J., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. ΒΆ1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105741 - 2017-09-21

James Schuette v. Ronald L. Van De Hey
proceed to reconsider the matter. Appropriations may be approved in whole or in part by the county
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10387 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
or inheritance is part of the marital state and is presumed subject to equal division. Hokin v. Hokin, 231 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39276 - 2009-08-11