Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27401 - 27410 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 27401 - 27410 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Lauralynn Stahnke v. Emilio Lontok, M.D.
in denying her motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict with respect to Bread and Roses. She contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9442 - 2005-03-31
in denying her motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict with respect to Bread and Roses. She contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9442 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Isace A. Whiting
for possession of methamphetamine. Whiting claims the circuit court erred by not granting his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5415 - 2017-09-19
for possession of methamphetamine. Whiting claims the circuit court erred by not granting his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5415 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(“Froedtert South”). As relevant to this appeal, the circuit court had granted a motion precluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098581 - 2026-03-31
(“Froedtert South”). As relevant to this appeal, the circuit court had granted a motion precluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098581 - 2026-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and ordered abatement of the nuisance. Basswood and Sargent filed a motion to vacate the default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209464 - 2018-03-08
, and ordered abatement of the nuisance. Basswood and Sargent filed a motion to vacate the default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209464 - 2018-03-08
[PDF]
Milwaukee Women's Medical Service, Inc. v. Joseph Scheidler
, JJ. WEDEMEYER, P.J. Joseph Scheidler appeals from a trial court order granting the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13915 - 2014-09-15
, JJ. WEDEMEYER, P.J. Joseph Scheidler appeals from a trial court order granting the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13915 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Austin argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because it based its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86046 - 2014-09-15
. Austin argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because it based its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86046 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the State’s motion to consolidate Woods’s four cases for trial over Woods’s objection. The court inquired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069279 - 2026-01-28
the State’s motion to consolidate Woods’s four cases for trial over Woods’s objection. The court inquired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069279 - 2026-01-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
David’s motion to re-open the default judgment. In the alternative, David argues that counsel provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30305 - 2014-09-15
David’s motion to re-open the default judgment. In the alternative, David argues that counsel provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30305 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
at the grounds hearing and erred when it denied David’s motion to re-open the default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30305 - 2007-09-17
at the grounds hearing and erred when it denied David’s motion to re-open the default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30305 - 2007-09-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
), as well as an order denying his motion seeking reconsideration of a No. 2017AP2236-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223909 - 2018-10-23
), as well as an order denying his motion seeking reconsideration of a No. 2017AP2236-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223909 - 2018-10-23