Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27411 - 27420 of 33970 for dismissed.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
charge to be dismissed and read in at sentencing. The maximum penalty for count two was a fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207493 - 2018-01-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the Plaintiffs’ claims against it should be dismissed because Wood County has immunity under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173638 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Robert J. Capps
to dismiss the remaining counts. Under the agreement, Capps’s prison exposure was reduced to ninety years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11931 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Gerald J. Van Camp
ultimately pled no contest to the false imprisonment count. The kidnapping charge was dismissed and read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14775 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court properly dismissed Crenshaw’s assertions of prosecutorial misconduct without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886263 - 2024-12-11

State v. Anthony Lentowski
dismiss and read in all other charges. Additionally, at sentencing the district attorney would “have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11403 - 2005-03-31

2010 WI APP 8
Jennifer’s father as guardian.[3] The circuit court denied both Jennifer’s motion to dismiss the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44903 - 2010-01-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of methamphetamine, and the possession of drug paraphernalia count was dismissed and read in.2 Smith argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859491 - 2024-10-10

Dane Co. DHS v. Shetria B.
663, ¶12. We therefore reverse and remand with directions to dismiss the Dane County Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26536 - 2006-09-20

Landshire Fast Foods of Milwaukee, Inc. v. Employers Mutual Casualty Company
the insurance policy and dismissed the complaint on the merits. Landshire appeals. DISCUSSION Standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6338 - 2005-03-31