Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27411 - 27420 of 65586 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 27411 - 27420 of 65586 for divorce records/1000.
State v. Jimmie Lee Fonder
to the racial composition of the jury panel. However, the appellate record does not establish that Fonder ever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8534 - 2005-03-31
to the racial composition of the jury panel. However, the appellate record does not establish that Fonder ever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8534 - 2005-03-31
Carol Peterson v. Marquette University
was not pleasing to Peterson. Nevertheless, there is no substantiation in the record documenting “intolerable
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8025 - 2005-03-31
was not pleasing to Peterson. Nevertheless, there is no substantiation in the record documenting “intolerable
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8025 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121300 - 2014-09-04
. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121300 - 2014-09-04
[PDF]
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did not clearly and unequivocally express that he wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6895 - 2017-09-20
and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did not clearly and unequivocally express that he wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6895 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we note a minor discrepancy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102447 - 2013-10-01
consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we note a minor discrepancy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102447 - 2013-10-01
COURT OF APPEALS
item into the record here. The jury will have that exhibit to refer to.” Perkins argues the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45328 - 2010-01-04
item into the record here. The jury will have that exhibit to refer to.” Perkins argues the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45328 - 2010-01-04
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 31, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
to this appeal. It appears from the record that on December 2, 2002, Gregory received a notice of a pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26916 - 2006-10-30
to this appeal. It appears from the record that on December 2, 2002, Gregory received a notice of a pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26916 - 2006-10-30
COURT OF APPEALS
imposing Storzer’s sentence were his record of past inappropriate and sometimes violent sexual behavior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48243 - 2010-03-22
imposing Storzer’s sentence were his record of past inappropriate and sometimes violent sexual behavior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48243 - 2010-03-22
Brown County v. April O.
was seventy-two days. An examination of the record fails to reveal any reason for a continuance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3418 - 2005-03-31
was seventy-two days. An examination of the record fails to reveal any reason for a continuance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3418 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106249 - 2014-01-07
review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106249 - 2014-01-07