Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27411 - 27420 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 27411 - 27420 of 63981 for records/1000.
Dawn K. Larson v. Russell T. Larson
a rational mental process based on the facts of record and the applicable law, and the result is reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6277 - 2005-03-31
a rational mental process based on the facts of record and the applicable law, and the result is reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6277 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph L. Kohls
806 (Ct. App. 1996). The record must show that the trial court exercised its discretion and stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2687 - 2005-03-31
806 (Ct. App. 1996). The record must show that the trial court exercised its discretion and stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2687 - 2005-03-31
William Becker v. John C. Tritschler
reviewing the record in this case, we conclude that the findings of fact are not clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9681 - 2005-03-31
reviewing the record in this case, we conclude that the findings of fact are not clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9681 - 2005-03-31
Waushara County v. Jean K. D.
the necessary findings under § 51.20. We conclude that the record before the court at the final commitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18395 - 2005-06-01
the necessary findings under § 51.20. We conclude that the record before the court at the final commitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18395 - 2005-06-01
State v. James C.M.
consider any other delinquent act that is read into the record and dismissed at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14069 - 2005-03-31
consider any other delinquent act that is read into the record and dismissed at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14069 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 51.67 (2015-16). 1 Upon reviewing the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233700 - 2019-01-30
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 51.67 (2015-16). 1 Upon reviewing the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233700 - 2019-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
claim for a prescriptive easement because he did not satisfy the requirement of recording an interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67958 - 2011-07-13
claim for a prescriptive easement because he did not satisfy the requirement of recording an interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67958 - 2011-07-13
CA Blank Order
it considered his sentence credit before imposing sentence. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147870 - 2015-08-30
it considered his sentence credit before imposing sentence. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147870 - 2015-08-30
CA Blank Order
the no-merit reports and the responses, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135176 - 2015-02-12
the no-merit reports and the responses, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135176 - 2015-02-12
[PDF]
State v. Willie E. Harris
for weighing and testing. It submitted a report, which is not included in the record. There is no dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21064 - 2017-09-21
for weighing and testing. It submitted a report, which is not included in the record. There is no dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21064 - 2017-09-21