Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27421 - 27430 of 33987 for dismissed.
Search results 27421 - 27430 of 33987 for dismissed.
COURT OF APPEALS
. In exchange for his plea, the State dismissed the penalty enhancer for Morris’s use of a dangerous weapon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73344 - 2011-11-07
. In exchange for his plea, the State dismissed the penalty enhancer for Morris’s use of a dangerous weapon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73344 - 2011-11-07
[PDF]
State v. Steven A. Conway
to dismiss the battery charge, Conway would enter a plea of no contest to the attempted first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8680 - 2017-09-19
to dismiss the battery charge, Conway would enter a plea of no contest to the attempted first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8680 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Sol Coleman, Jr.
the relevant facts: although Lou C. was charged with prostitution, the charge was later dismissed; Lou C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8083 - 2017-09-19
the relevant facts: although Lou C. was charged with prostitution, the charge was later dismissed; Lou C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8083 - 2017-09-19
State v. Brian A. Schultz
The circuit court denied Schultz’s motion to dismiss the bail jumping charges as multiplicitous. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3329 - 2005-03-31
The circuit court denied Schultz’s motion to dismiss the bail jumping charges as multiplicitous. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3329 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony W. Quattrochi
attempted to question the deputy about his personal knowledge of applicable penalties and dismissal policies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12783 - 2005-03-31
attempted to question the deputy about his personal knowledge of applicable penalties and dismissal policies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12783 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b) was dismissed.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32740 - 2008-05-19
. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b) was dismissed.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32740 - 2008-05-19
Frontsheet
that unless it was filed within five days, the appeal would be subject to dismissal or other sanctions
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119971 - 2014-08-20
that unless it was filed within five days, the appeal would be subject to dismissal or other sanctions
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119971 - 2014-08-20
[PDF]
Kinko's, Inc. v. Craig Shuler
for Kinko’s claims and that Northern should be dismissed from the case on the merits. Digicopy appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4363 - 2017-09-19
for Kinko’s claims and that Northern should be dismissed from the case on the merits. Digicopy appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4363 - 2017-09-19
State v. Karl D. Heppner
argues that he inferentially raised a multiplicity claim by seeking to dismiss count one on the grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13239 - 2005-03-31
argues that he inferentially raised a multiplicity claim by seeking to dismiss count one on the grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13239 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the Kalugins’ challenge to the denial of their motion to enlarge time to answer. See id. at 218-19 (dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33249 - 2008-06-30
the Kalugins’ challenge to the denial of their motion to enlarge time to answer. See id. at 218-19 (dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33249 - 2008-06-30