Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27421 - 27430 of 65155 for or b.
Search results 27421 - 27430 of 65155 for or b.
2009 WI APP 42
,† Medicare Parts A & B and Rock County, Subrogated-Plaintiffs, v. Wisconsin Patients
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35927 - 2009-05-11
,† Medicare Parts A & B and Rock County, Subrogated-Plaintiffs, v. Wisconsin Patients
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35927 - 2009-05-11
Milwaukee Police Association v. City of Milwaukee
its decision on section 36-13-4-b of the Milwaukee City Charter, which provides that “all expenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13002 - 2005-03-31
its decision on section 36-13-4-b of the Milwaukee City Charter, which provides that “all expenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13002 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jerome G. Semrau
exploitation of a child contrary to WIS. STAT. § 948.05(1)(b) (1997-98), 1 one for each explicit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14850 - 2017-09-21
exploitation of a child contrary to WIS. STAT. § 948.05(1)(b) (1997-98), 1 one for each explicit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14850 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, is to a per curiam opinion that is ineligible for publication. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(4)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417693 - 2021-08-31
, is to a per curiam opinion that is ineligible for publication. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(4)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417693 - 2021-08-31
Pamela O'Neil v. Helen Patenaude
O'Neil, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Helen Patenaude, d/b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12229 - 2005-03-31
O'Neil, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Helen Patenaude, d/b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12229 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the domestic abuse assessment penalty enhancers contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 941.30(1), 939.63(1)(b), 939.62(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640910 - 2023-04-04
, and the domestic abuse assessment penalty enhancers contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 941.30(1), 939.63(1)(b), 939.62(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640910 - 2023-04-04
COURT OF APPEALS
of existing law or the establishment of new law,” contrary to Wis. Stat. § 802.05(2)(b). The court noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144176 - 2015-07-08
of existing law or the establishment of new law,” contrary to Wis. Stat. § 802.05(2)(b). The court noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144176 - 2015-07-08
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel was ineffective. See id. at 697. b) Trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81719 - 2012-05-17
counsel was ineffective. See id. at 697. b) Trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81719 - 2012-05-17
COURT OF APPEALS
for the additional insured to “liability arising out of: a. Your [Dan-Ash’s] premises; b. ‘Your [Dan-Ash’s] work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47351 - 2010-02-24
for the additional insured to “liability arising out of: a. Your [Dan-Ash’s] premises; b. ‘Your [Dan-Ash’s] work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47351 - 2010-02-24
[PDF]
Faye Meyer v. The Laser Vision Institute, LLC
,† V. THE LASER VISION INSTITUTE, LLC, D/B/A THE LASIK VISION INSTITUTE, A FLORIDA CORPORATION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21525 - 2017-09-21
,† V. THE LASER VISION INSTITUTE, LLC, D/B/A THE LASIK VISION INSTITUTE, A FLORIDA CORPORATION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21525 - 2017-09-21