Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27431 - 27440 of 29958 for de.
Search results 27431 - 27440 of 29958 for de.
[PDF]
NOTICE
additional facts as needed below. Discussion ¶6 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36614 - 2014-09-15
additional facts as needed below. Discussion ¶6 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36614 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Von Haden, Jr.
which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification, however, presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7060 - 2017-09-20
which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification, however, presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7060 - 2017-09-20
Frontsheet
there is sufficient evidence to support a bindover is a question of law subject to de novo review. See Williams, 104
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117785 - 2014-07-22
there is sufficient evidence to support a bindover is a question of law subject to de novo review. See Williams, 104
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117785 - 2014-07-22
COURT OF APPEALS
, which we review de novo. State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79, ¶12, 292 Wis. 2d 43, 717 N.W.2d 676. ¶23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115434 - 2014-06-25
, which we review de novo. State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79, ¶12, 292 Wis. 2d 43, 717 N.W.2d 676. ¶23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115434 - 2014-06-25
[PDF]
Batteries Plus, LLC v. Clinton Mohr
this question de novo, Winkelman v. Beloit Memorial Hospital, 168 Wis. 2d 12, 24, 483 N.W.2d 211 (1992
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17521 - 2017-09-21
this question de novo, Winkelman v. Beloit Memorial Hospital, 168 Wis. 2d 12, 24, 483 N.W.2d 211 (1992
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17521 - 2017-09-21
State v. Nora M. Al-Shammari
, and, if so, whether it passes statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14887 - 2005-03-31
, and, if so, whether it passes statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14887 - 2005-03-31
Jack Lobenstein v. American Family Insurance
its motion for summary judgment. We review summary judgment de novo. Cody v. Dane County, 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4355 - 2005-03-31
its motion for summary judgment. We review summary judgment de novo. Cody v. Dane County, 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4355 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. See Waity v. No. 2024AP606 7 LeMahieu, 2022 WI 6, ¶18, 400 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=952384 - 2025-05-06
that we review de novo. See Waity v. No. 2024AP606 7 LeMahieu, 2022 WI 6, ¶18, 400 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=952384 - 2025-05-06
Mary E. Fazio v. Department of Employee Trust Funds
of law, which we review de novo, see Hensley, 2001 WI 105 at ¶6; however, we benefit in our review from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4422 - 2005-03-31
of law, which we review de novo, see Hensley, 2001 WI 105 at ¶6; however, we benefit in our review from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4422 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. ¶26 If we conclude the defendant has not proved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83298 - 2012-06-06
de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. ¶26 If we conclude the defendant has not proved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83298 - 2012-06-06