Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27431 - 27440 of 64775 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 27431 - 27440 of 64775 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129467 - 2017-09-21
not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129467 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. As Castleberry points out, however, the sentencing record must show the basis for the court’s exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40614 - 2009-09-09
. As Castleberry points out, however, the sentencing record must show the basis for the court’s exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40614 - 2009-09-09
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the no-merit report, and following an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913870 - 2025-02-12
of the no-merit report, and following an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913870 - 2025-02-12
Thomas M. Holmgreen v. John A. Hulleman
that these documents are not a part of the record. The Holmgreens consequently move for fees and costs for what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25479 - 2006-06-12
that these documents are not a part of the record. The Holmgreens consequently move for fees and costs for what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25479 - 2006-06-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
actually understood the nature of the charge. If the record shows that a trial court conducted a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26856 - 2006-10-18
actually understood the nature of the charge. If the record shows that a trial court conducted a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26856 - 2006-10-18
State v. James L. Kirk
. The record belies this claim. Kirk’s attorney made a demand for discovery and acknowledged that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6644 - 2005-03-31
. The record belies this claim. Kirk’s attorney made a demand for discovery and acknowledged that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6644 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that he was sentenced on the basis of inaccurate information about his prior criminal record. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132840 - 2017-09-21
that he was sentenced on the basis of inaccurate information about his prior criminal record. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132840 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247128 - 2019-09-25
not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247128 - 2019-09-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2021AP1885-CRNM 2 independently reviewed the record, the no-merit report, and the response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573423 - 2022-10-04
. No. 2021AP1885-CRNM 2 independently reviewed the record, the no-merit report, and the response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573423 - 2022-10-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2019AP1436-CRNM 2 record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542307 - 2022-07-08
. No. 2019AP1436-CRNM 2 record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542307 - 2022-07-08