Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27441 - 27450 of 29957 for de.

Elizabeth J. Kohl v. DeWitt Ross & Stevens
.…” The construction of a statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Fox v. Catholic Knights Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19283 - 2005-09-19

[PDF] State v. Aaron T. Hicks
are questions of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id. Since a defendant must show both deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3473 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] John D. May v. Joseph F. Cusick, M.D.
In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16033 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
At trial, De Pere police officer Anthony Phelps testified that on October 1, 2013, he observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191889 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional principles to the findings of fact de novo.” State v. Smiter, 2011 WI App 15, ¶9, 331 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223908 - 2018-11-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
counterclaim rule, to the set of facts before us is a question of law that we review de novo. See Menard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98294 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Richard W. Ziervogel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment
. Const. art. XI, § 3(1); De Rosso Landfill Company, Inc. v. City of Oak Creek, 200 Wis. 2d 642, 657
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16640 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jeannie M. P.
performance was deficient or prejudicial are legal questions we decide de novo. See id. at 236-37
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18686 - 2005-08-30

John P. Trachte v. Andrew E. Barrer
the merits of the trial court's decision de novo, First Nat'l Bank v. Dickinson, 103 Wis.2d 428, 442, 308 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8301 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. State v. King, 2005 WI App 224, ¶11, 287 Wis. 2d 756, 706 N.W.2d 181. The trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212462 - 2018-05-08