Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27451 - 27460 of 63539 for records.
Search results 27451 - 27460 of 63539 for records.
State v. Deandre Brown
counsel. Because probable cause for his arrest did exist and the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19087 - 2005-07-25
counsel. Because probable cause for his arrest did exist and the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19087 - 2005-07-25
[PDF]
Connie L. J. v. Michael D.
best interest. Because the record reflects a reasonable exercise of discretion, we affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3585 - 2017-09-19
best interest. Because the record reflects a reasonable exercise of discretion, we affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3585 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Terrance J. Robran v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
reversing an order issued by LIRC. After reviewing the record and conferring with the Administrative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14102 - 2014-09-15
reversing an order issued by LIRC. After reviewing the record and conferring with the Administrative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14102 - 2014-09-15
State v. Scott Morrissey
has carefully examined the record to determine whether, in fact, this was the stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16080 - 2005-03-31
has carefully examined the record to determine whether, in fact, this was the stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16080 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
)(a) that the statement was … a prior inconsistent statement of the declarant. We did hear [S.G.] state on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249297 - 2019-10-29
)(a) that the statement was … a prior inconsistent statement of the declarant. We did hear [S.G.] state on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249297 - 2019-10-29
COURT OF APPEALS
dismissal motion is supported by the record from the preliminary hearing and supports the discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29133 - 2007-06-26
dismissal motion is supported by the record from the preliminary hearing and supports the discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29133 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the record on appeal and was reviewed by this court. We may review video evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243823 - 2019-07-16
in the record on appeal and was reviewed by this court. We may review video evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243823 - 2019-07-16
COURT OF APPEALS
argument. Martin contends that the State misrepresented facts and referred to evidence not in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56964 - 2010-11-22
argument. Martin contends that the State misrepresented facts and referred to evidence not in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56964 - 2010-11-22
WI App 116 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP1210 Complete Title o...
. 1983). The finding is not “clearly erroneous” when there is credible evidence in the record to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36785 - 2009-08-25
. 1983). The finding is not “clearly erroneous” when there is credible evidence in the record to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36785 - 2009-08-25
Jerry R. Dowdley, Jr. v. Circuit Court for Dane County
, the court ordered the return of the record.[1] After the return was filed, the court denied the petitioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13520 - 2005-03-31
, the court ordered the return of the record.[1] After the return was filed, the court denied the petitioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13520 - 2005-03-31