Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27461 - 27470 of 30059 for de.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
concluded on de novo review that the court’s interpretation of the lease was correct, we reject McCune’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000714 - 2025-08-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the deficient performance prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶¶38-39
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887928 - 2024-12-10

[PDF] WI App 69
, not potentially hazardous, homemade foods.8 We review WCFA’s challenge de novo. Blake v. Jossart, 2016 WI 57
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878326 - 2025-01-24

[PDF] Bank of Sun Prairie v. Marshall Development Company
the same methodology as the trial court, and our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2518 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, our review is de novo. See State v. Turnpaugh, 2007 WI App 222, ¶2, 305 Wis. 2d 722, 741 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228778 - 2018-12-04

[PDF] Trinity Evangelical Lutheran Church and School-Freistadt v. Tower Insurance Company
a de novo standard of review when passing on a trial court’s determination of the constitutionality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3925 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Jerome Hoepker v. City of Madison Plan Commission
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Lake City Corp. v. City of Mequon, 207 Wis. 2d 156, 162-63
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17039 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
., 55 Wis. 2d 27, 33, 197 N.W.2d 783 (1972) (citations omitted). ¶14 We review de novo the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60123 - 2011-02-16

Forest County v. Wesley S. Goode
meaning of the statute. The construction of a statute or ordinance is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11844 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
to grant a defendant’s motion to dismiss for insufficient evidence at the close of plaintiff’s case on a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35199 - 2009-01-12