Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27461 - 27470 of 30059 for de.
Search results 27461 - 27470 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law, which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72257 - 2014-09-15
counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law, which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72257 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jay A. Starkweather
a defendant to relief is a question of law we review de novo. Id. However, if the motion does fail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13808 - 2014-09-15
a defendant to relief is a question of law we review de novo. Id. However, if the motion does fail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13808 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Kennn Kliese, v. Mariella Bates
of law, which we review de novo. Id. However, because the trial court’s legal determination is so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3139 - 2017-09-19
of law, which we review de novo. Id. However, because the trial court’s legal determination is so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3139 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Miracle Reed v. Daniel C. Luebke
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See Oliveto v. Circuit Court for Crawford County, 194 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5575 - 2017-09-19
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See Oliveto v. Circuit Court for Crawford County, 194 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5575 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Id. at 128. Since a defendant must show both deficient performance and prejudice, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72257 - 2011-10-12
de novo. Id. at 128. Since a defendant must show both deficient performance and prejudice, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72257 - 2011-10-12
John D. May v. Joseph F. Cusick, M.D.
In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16033 - 2005-03-31
In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16033 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 571, 665 N.W.2d 305. However, we review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144883 - 2015-07-22
Wis. 2d 571, 665 N.W.2d 305. However, we review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144883 - 2015-07-22
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Harris
the initial investigative stop in this case, are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Guzy
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17026 - 2017-09-21
the initial investigative stop in this case, are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Guzy
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17026 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 108
of law de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54030 - 2014-09-15
of law de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54030 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 33
to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2019-20).4 We review de novo the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534037 - 2022-10-12
to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2019-20).4 We review de novo the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534037 - 2022-10-12