Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27461 - 27470 of 46939 for show's.
Search results 27461 - 27470 of 46939 for show's.
State v. Derek Ronald Bliss
sentence modification based on a new factor must first show that a new factor exists. State v. Champion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25234 - 2006-05-22
sentence modification based on a new factor must first show that a new factor exists. State v. Champion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25234 - 2006-05-22
State v. Tracey T. Williams
reasonably. Id. To gain reversal, the defendant must show that the court relied upon an unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6242 - 2014-01-08
reasonably. Id. To gain reversal, the defendant must show that the court relied upon an unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6242 - 2014-01-08
State v. Harold C. Maass
-included offense of second-degree intentional homicide require a showing of an intent to kill. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8287 - 2005-03-31
-included offense of second-degree intentional homicide require a showing of an intent to kill. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8287 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
by physical force or show of authority, and that he or she is not free to leave. State v. Washington, 2005 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136999 - 2015-03-05
by physical force or show of authority, and that he or she is not free to leave. State v. Washington, 2005 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136999 - 2015-03-05
[PDF]
Sharman M. Smith v. Gypsum Supply Company
show that Gypsum’s claim was not barred under § 859.02(1), STATS. Smith knew about Gypsum’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11711 - 2017-09-20
show that Gypsum’s claim was not barred under § 859.02(1), STATS. Smith knew about Gypsum’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11711 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Anthony J. Kaufmann v. Jason Baumann
and a different transmission. Baumann entered no evidence showing otherwise. We therefore affirm the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11798 - 2017-09-21
and a different transmission. Baumann entered no evidence showing otherwise. We therefore affirm the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11798 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Leopoldo Pequeno
to show certification means that, upon objection, the test results will be inadmissible at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6142 - 2017-09-19
to show certification means that, upon objection, the test results will be inadmissible at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6142 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In sum, the court’s discussion plainly shows that it rationally applied the proper standard of law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165141 - 2017-09-21
. In sum, the court’s discussion plainly shows that it rationally applied the proper standard of law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165141 - 2017-09-21
State v. Artie L. Terrell
. There is sufficient evidence in the record to show that the Terry standard was satisfied. That is, the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10851 - 2005-03-31
. There is sufficient evidence in the record to show that the Terry standard was satisfied. That is, the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10851 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. A defendant who fails to raise claims in his or her initial motion has the burden to show a sufficient reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85755 - 2015-08-06
. A defendant who fails to raise claims in his or her initial motion has the burden to show a sufficient reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85755 - 2015-08-06