Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27481 - 27490 of 64150 for records.
Search results 27481 - 27490 of 64150 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, as a repeater. An initial review of the record showed that at the plea hearing, the circuit court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105800 - 2017-09-21
, as a repeater. An initial review of the record showed that at the plea hearing, the circuit court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105800 - 2017-09-21
State v. James L. Anderson
did not respond. After an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10031 - 2005-03-31
did not respond. After an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10031 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and an independent review of the record, the judgment is summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241299 - 2019-05-24
of the report and an independent review of the record, the judgment is summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241299 - 2019-05-24
Robert Abraham v. Patrick Fox
. The Abrahams responded they did not. Our review of the record discloses there are no alleged evidentiary facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2302 - 2005-03-31
. The Abrahams responded they did not. Our review of the record discloses there are no alleged evidentiary facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2302 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174958 - 2017-09-21
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174958 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832245 - 2024-07-31
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832245 - 2024-07-31
CA Blank Order
. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102628 - 2013-09-30
. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102628 - 2013-09-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the records, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1073137 - 2026-02-05
not responded. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the records, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1073137 - 2026-02-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717186 - 2023-10-25
2 consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717186 - 2023-10-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction and an order denying her postconviction motion.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241549 - 2019-05-30
of conviction and an order denying her postconviction motion.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241549 - 2019-05-30