Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27491 - 27500 of 46239 for adulte name change.
Search results 27491 - 27500 of 46239 for adulte name change.
State v. Melvin D. Toran
version unless otherwise noted. [2] We note that a change in parole policy does not constitute a “new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20512 - 2005-12-05
version unless otherwise noted. [2] We note that a change in parole policy does not constitute a “new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20512 - 2005-12-05
COURT OF APPEALS
. However, B&K does not explain how, if we agree with it on this issue, this would change the outcome. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34590 - 2008-11-12
. However, B&K does not explain how, if we agree with it on this issue, this would change the outcome. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34590 - 2008-11-12
State v. Corey A. Keller
benefited Keller in any way. Keller concedes that striking the repeater allegations was unlikely to change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13845 - 2005-03-31
benefited Keller in any way. Keller concedes that striking the repeater allegations was unlikely to change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13845 - 2005-03-31
The Warehouse II, LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
differences change the outcome. In Wieczorek, the city’s jurisdictional offer was defective because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6995 - 2005-03-31
differences change the outcome. In Wieczorek, the city’s jurisdictional offer was defective because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6995 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Marilyn C. Goetsch v. Howard N. Goetsch
of changed circumstances. We reject his arguments and affirm the order. Howard based his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13180 - 2017-09-21
of changed circumstances. We reject his arguments and affirm the order. Howard based his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13180 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Lonna L. Handschke
that the alleged “new factors” would not have changed Handschke’s sentence because the court had considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12336 - 2017-09-21
that the alleged “new factors” would not have changed Handschke’s sentence because the court had considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12336 - 2017-09-21
State v. Victor Raygoza
of the record, concluded that there were no other meritorious issues. We see nothing to change that conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7533 - 2005-03-31
of the record, concluded that there were no other meritorious issues. We see nothing to change that conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7533 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
The Warehouse II, LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
the factual differences change the outcome. In Wieczorek, the city’s jurisdictional offer was defective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6995 - 2017-09-20
the factual differences change the outcome. In Wieczorek, the city’s jurisdictional offer was defective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6995 - 2017-09-20
State v. Jackie Green
effect, if any, a change in sentence credit would have on Green’s current situation. See Sweet v. Berge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16208 - 2005-03-31
effect, if any, a change in sentence credit would have on Green’s current situation. See Sweet v. Berge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16208 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jackie Green
effect, if any, a change in sentence credit would have on Green’s current situation. See Sweet v. Berge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16209 - 2005-03-31
effect, if any, a change in sentence credit would have on Green’s current situation. See Sweet v. Berge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16209 - 2005-03-31