Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27491 - 27500 of 29810 for des.
Search results 27491 - 27500 of 29810 for des.
Jerome Hoepker v. City of Madison Plan Commission
, which we review de novo. See Lake City Corp. v. City of Mequon, 207 Wis. 2d 156, 162-63, 558 N.W.2d 100
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17039 - 2005-03-31
, which we review de novo. See Lake City Corp. v. City of Mequon, 207 Wis. 2d 156, 162-63, 558 N.W.2d 100
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17039 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Newago
that behavior prejudiced the defense, however, are questions of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20080 - 2005-10-26
that behavior prejudiced the defense, however, are questions of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20080 - 2005-10-26
Judy Hartman v. Winnebago County
is a matter of law which we review de novo, benefitting from the analyses of the circuit court and the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17094 - 2005-03-31
is a matter of law which we review de novo, benefitting from the analyses of the circuit court and the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17094 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
his constitutional right to a speedy trial has been violated. We review de novo whether a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37084 - 2009-07-06
his constitutional right to a speedy trial has been violated. We review de novo whether a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37084 - 2009-07-06
[PDF]
WI App 147
confirmation of the accuracy of what he told the officers was de minimis—the jury would have still heard what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72631 - 2014-09-15
confirmation of the accuracy of what he told the officers was de minimis—the jury would have still heard what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72631 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Angela M. McEvoy v. Group Health Cooperative of Eau Claire
a question of law that we determine de novo. See First Nat. No. 96-0908 6 Leasing Corp. v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17104 - 2017-09-21
a question of law that we determine de novo. See First Nat. No. 96-0908 6 Leasing Corp. v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17104 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Harris
the initial investigative stop in this case, are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Guzy
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17025 - 2017-09-21
the initial investigative stop in this case, are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Guzy
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17025 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Susan M. Tennyson v. School District of the Menomonie Area
of law” that this court reviews de novo. Stern, 185 Wis.2d at 236, 517 N.W.2d at 664. Further, “[a]n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15264 - 2017-09-21
of law” that this court reviews de novo. Stern, 185 Wis.2d at 236, 517 N.W.2d at 664. Further, “[a]n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15264 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 113
. § 980.09 in light of existing case law. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66896 - 2014-09-15
. § 980.09 in light of existing case law. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66896 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mary E. Fazio v. Department of Employee Trust Funds
de novo, see Hensley, 2001 WI 105 at ¶6; however, we benefit in our review from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4422 - 2017-09-19
de novo, see Hensley, 2001 WI 105 at ¶6; however, we benefit in our review from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4422 - 2017-09-19