Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27491 - 27500 of 83742 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 27491 - 27500 of 83742 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Gregory K. Scott
No. [Enter Case No. and Press Close] 1 COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11598 - 2017-09-19
No. [Enter Case No. and Press Close] 1 COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11598 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Julie Dixon
2 applicable law and failed to consider all the relevant facts in this case, we reverse the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13355 - 2017-09-21
2 applicable law and failed to consider all the relevant facts in this case, we reverse the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13355 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
, in 1990 Doyle received a seventeen-year sentence in a Milwaukee county case. Ten years later he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108955 - 2014-03-11
, in 1990 Doyle received a seventeen-year sentence in a Milwaukee county case. Ten years later he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108955 - 2014-03-11
[PDF]
Supreme Court of Wisconsin
1. Must a judge recuse himself or herself from hearing the cases in drug court of participants who
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39804 - 2014-09-15
1. Must a judge recuse himself or herself from hearing the cases in drug court of participants who
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39804 - 2014-09-15
Supreme Court of Wisconsin
________________________________________________________________________ ISSUES 1. Must a judge recuse himself or herself from hearing the cases in drug court
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39804 - 2009-08-17
________________________________________________________________________ ISSUES 1. Must a judge recuse himself or herself from hearing the cases in drug court
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39804 - 2009-08-17
[PDF]
State v. Gregory Poston
1 The underlying case was Milwaukee County Circuit Court case number F-880031. A copy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12669 - 2017-09-21
1 The underlying case was Milwaukee County Circuit Court case number F-880031. A copy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12669 - 2017-09-21
Kevin A. Laufer v. Town of Merton
for reconsideration. The court dismissed the action at the conclusion of the Laufers’ case, finding that they had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14080 - 2005-03-31
for reconsideration. The court dismissed the action at the conclusion of the Laufers’ case, finding that they had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14080 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Percy Ray Morgan
program. The sentence imposed in this case does not violate any part of this statute. The sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16071 - 2017-09-21
program. The sentence imposed in this case does not violate any part of this statute. The sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16071 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joshua G. Storlie
based on her representation of a potential witness in one of these cases. The information regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11125 - 2017-09-19
based on her representation of a potential witness in one of these cases. The information regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11125 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, P.J., Hruz and Seidl, JJ. Warren Slocum has again appealed the same underlying case. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185294 - 2017-09-21
, P.J., Hruz and Seidl, JJ. Warren Slocum has again appealed the same underlying case. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185294 - 2017-09-21