Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2751 - 2760 of 29713 for des.
Search results 2751 - 2760 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
Viola Leimbach v. Martin A. Kummer
of the motion for summary judgment. ¶9 Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6041 - 2017-09-19
of the motion for summary judgment. ¶9 Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6041 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and dismissed Chula Vista’s claims. Chula Vista now appeals. ¶5 We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546539 - 2022-07-21
and dismissed Chula Vista’s claims. Chula Vista now appeals. ¶5 We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546539 - 2022-07-21
Margaret Anderson v. David Anderson
of the court’s decision. See Hughes, 223 Wis. 2d at 120. We review questions of law de novo. See id. Our task
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16278 - 2005-03-31
of the court’s decision. See Hughes, 223 Wis. 2d at 120. We review questions of law de novo. See id. Our task
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16278 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28362 - 2007-03-12
questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28362 - 2007-03-12
Frontsheet
complaint, to file a de novo disciplinary action, or to take no action at all. In this case, a de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143347 - 2015-06-18
complaint, to file a de novo disciplinary action, or to take no action at all. In this case, a de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143347 - 2015-06-18
State v. Gary L. Everts
which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification, however, presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18233 - 2005-05-24
which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification, however, presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18233 - 2005-05-24
COURT OF APPEALS
the verdict de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Logterman v. Dawson, 190 Wis. 2d 90, 101
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33503 - 2008-07-23
the verdict de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Logterman v. Dawson, 190 Wis. 2d 90, 101
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33503 - 2008-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
356, 362, 369 N.W.2d 186 (Ct. App. 1985). We do not review the record de novo, but rather search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66366 - 2011-06-22
356, 362, 369 N.W.2d 186 (Ct. App. 1985). We do not review the record de novo, but rather search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66366 - 2011-06-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
acceptance of responsibility … as ‘de minimus’” and considered that to be an aggravating factor; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35639 - 2014-09-15
acceptance of responsibility … as ‘de minimus’” and considered that to be an aggravating factor; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35639 - 2014-09-15
WI App 92 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2758 Complete Title ...
, and the Paskiewiczes appeal. Additional facts are discussed below as needed. DISCUSSION ¶4 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98477 - 2013-07-30
, and the Paskiewiczes appeal. Additional facts are discussed below as needed. DISCUSSION ¶4 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98477 - 2013-07-30