Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27501 - 27510 of 74474 for a ha.
Search results 27501 - 27510 of 74474 for a ha.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2023AP1151-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997116 - 2025-08-20
notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2023AP1151-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997116 - 2025-08-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) the petitioner has a clear legal right to relief; (2) the entity to whom the writ is directed has a positive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116156 - 2017-09-21
) the petitioner has a clear legal right to relief; (2) the entity to whom the writ is directed has a positive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116156 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134245 - 2015-02-08
You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134245 - 2015-02-08
[PDF]
State v. Paul Taylor
, that Taylor has failed to meet his initial burden. Whether a lineup is impermissibly suggestive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11546 - 2017-09-19
, that Taylor has failed to meet his initial burden. Whether a lineup is impermissibly suggestive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11546 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955621 - 2025-05-13
You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955621 - 2025-05-13
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
conclude, however, that Rychtik has not demonstrated a new factor. ¶8 To be a new factor, Rychtik’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4660 - 2005-03-31
conclude, however, that Rychtik has not demonstrated a new factor. ¶8 To be a new factor, Rychtik’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4660 - 2005-03-31
State v. Antonio Q. Cruz
months that this particular prosecutor, Shelly Rusch, has been admonished by this court for improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3359 - 2005-03-31
months that this particular prosecutor, Shelly Rusch, has been admonished by this court for improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3359 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
conclude, however, that Rychtik has not demonstrated a new factor. ¶8 To be a new factor, Rychtik’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4656 - 2005-03-31
conclude, however, that Rychtik has not demonstrated a new factor. ¶8 To be a new factor, Rychtik’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4656 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dawn M. Sabel v. Martin E. Rosenthal
court relied on its inherent authority when it sanctioned the Sabels.1 A trial court has the inherent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2784 - 2017-09-19
court relied on its inherent authority when it sanctioned the Sabels.1 A trial court has the inherent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2784 - 2017-09-19
Evelyn C. R. v. Tykila S.
rights. We conclude that by failing to appear for the scheduled fact-finding hearing, Tykila S. has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2748 - 2005-03-31
rights. We conclude that by failing to appear for the scheduled fact-finding hearing, Tykila S. has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2748 - 2005-03-31