Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27501 - 27510 of 40048 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 27501 - 27510 of 40048 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
received a consensual private reprimand for making a false statement of fact to a tribunal. Private
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156717 - 2017-09-21
received a consensual private reprimand for making a false statement of fact to a tribunal. Private
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156717 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
has been revoked and reinstated multiple times. On May 25, 2021, the department filed a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641335 - 2023-04-04
has been revoked and reinstated multiple times. On May 25, 2021, the department filed a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641335 - 2023-04-04
State v. William F. Williams
with the State. He argues that the trial court’s statement that “I have just made a policy” to reject Alford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15307 - 2005-03-31
with the State. He argues that the trial court’s statement that “I have just made a policy” to reject Alford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15307 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, Clarmont contends “the lack of such a statement [by Clarmont] does not change [his] clearly expressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141858 - 2015-05-18
, Clarmont contends “the lack of such a statement [by Clarmont] does not change [his] clearly expressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141858 - 2015-05-18
[PDF]
State v. Eric W. Raye
with the following statement: Okay. The verdict is not unanimous from the response, at least, initially
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18434 - 2017-09-21
with the following statement: Okay. The verdict is not unanimous from the response, at least, initially
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18434 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
never made an explicit statement that it was relying on Bales’ reports. We reject this argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763390 - 2024-02-13
never made an explicit statement that it was relying on Bales’ reports. We reject this argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763390 - 2024-02-13
[PDF]
State v. Randolph S. Miller
corrected the trial court’s initial statement of the total maximum sentence at stake before stating he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5552 - 2017-09-19
corrected the trial court’s initial statement of the total maximum sentence at stake before stating he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5552 - 2017-09-19
State v. Eric W. Raye
court excused the 11 jurors from the courtroom with the following statement: Okay. The verdict
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18434 - 2005-06-06
court excused the 11 jurors from the courtroom with the following statement: Okay. The verdict
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18434 - 2005-06-06
State v. Ralph E. Adams
to prove the truth of any statement allegedly made by the caller who threatened Olsen. See § 908.01(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12710 - 2005-03-31
to prove the truth of any statement allegedly made by the caller who threatened Olsen. See § 908.01(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12710 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
his suppression motion because “Kelley’s order to come to the door combined with a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102717 - 2013-10-07
his suppression motion because “Kelley’s order to come to the door combined with a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102717 - 2013-10-07