Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27501 - 27510 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 27501 - 27510 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
Washington County v. Richard E. Hupfer
contrary to § 346.63(1)(b), Stats.[1] Hupfer now appeals, claiming that the arresting officer lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11665 - 2005-03-31
contrary to § 346.63(1)(b), Stats.[1] Hupfer now appeals, claiming that the arresting officer lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11665 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, and therefore his claims are barred. Jordan’s current claims are also barred by State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96208 - 2014-09-15
, and therefore his claims are barred. Jordan’s current claims are also barred by State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96208 - 2014-09-15
State v. Carl G. Brosinski
hit Haugen when he tried to stop her from jumping from his moving car. Haugen claims that Brosinski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9050 - 2005-03-31
hit Haugen when he tried to stop her from jumping from his moving car. Haugen claims that Brosinski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9050 - 2005-03-31
Reginald D. Burke v. Gary McCaughtry
to Burke’s sliding cell door. Burke claims that the track lies outside his cell. Prison guards also found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14274 - 2005-03-31
to Burke’s sliding cell door. Burke claims that the track lies outside his cell. Prison guards also found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14274 - 2005-03-31
Sunburst IV Limited Partnership v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
a Wisconsin Real Estate Transfer Return to document the transaction, claiming an exemption from real estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5664 - 2005-03-31
a Wisconsin Real Estate Transfer Return to document the transaction, claiming an exemption from real estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5664 - 2005-03-31
State v. Craig L. Miller
claims. Miller argues that his right to be free from double jeopardy was violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3345 - 2005-03-31
claims. Miller argues that his right to be free from double jeopardy was violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3345 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
We summarily affirm. The underlying claims stem from the alleged misuse of investment funds during
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502022 - 2022-04-05
We summarily affirm. The underlying claims stem from the alleged misuse of investment funds during
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502022 - 2022-04-05
[PDF]
Martha Sue Gatten v. Eileen Perket
to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2003-04 version unless otherwise noted. 2 Gatten makes additional claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25937 - 2017-09-21
to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2003-04 version unless otherwise noted. 2 Gatten makes additional claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25937 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
satisfied the criteria of the joinder statute, WIS. STAT. § 971.12. Therefore, we reject Reynoso’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992307 - 2025-08-06
satisfied the criteria of the joinder statute, WIS. STAT. § 971.12. Therefore, we reject Reynoso’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992307 - 2025-08-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 334. A Rothering motion must allege with particularity how and why his current claims were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129301 - 2017-09-21
N.W.2d 334. A Rothering motion must allege with particularity how and why his current claims were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129301 - 2017-09-21