Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27511 - 27520 of 30070 for de.
Search results 27511 - 27520 of 30070 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Jeannie M. P.
, but whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial are legal questions we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18686 - 2017-09-21
, but whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial are legal questions we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18686 - 2017-09-21
WI APP 43 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1724 Complete Title ...
such relief is available to him is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Pozo, 2002 WI App 279, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109387 - 2014-05-08
such relief is available to him is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Pozo, 2002 WI App 279, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109387 - 2014-05-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation, for the sake of this particular argument we apply a de novo standard of review. See Seider v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894720 - 2024-12-26
interpretation, for the sake of this particular argument we apply a de novo standard of review. See Seider v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894720 - 2024-12-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
case necessarily standing on its own factual ground.” Id. (citation omitted). We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201428 - 2017-11-08
case necessarily standing on its own factual ground.” Id. (citation omitted). We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201428 - 2017-11-08
[PDF]
State v. Kenosha County Board of Adjustment
conducting statutory certiorari judicial review, our standard of review of the circuit court's ruling is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10761 - 2017-09-20
conducting statutory certiorari judicial review, our standard of review of the circuit court's ruling is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10761 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Isaacs Holding Corp. v. Premiere Property Group, LLC
review de novo. See State v. Hansford, 219 Wis. 2d 226, 246, 580 N.W.2d 171 (1998). ¶32 Discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6633 - 2017-09-20
review de novo. See State v. Hansford, 219 Wis. 2d 226, 246, 580 N.W.2d 171 (1998). ¶32 Discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6633 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Jack Lobenstein v. American Family Insurance
summary judgment de novo. Cody v. Dane County, 2001 WI App 60 ¶11, 242 Wis. 2d 173, 625 N.W.2d 630
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4355 - 2017-09-19
summary judgment de novo. Cody v. Dane County, 2001 WI App 60 ¶11, 242 Wis. 2d 173, 625 N.W.2d 630
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4355 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. See Waity v. No. 2024AP606 7 LeMahieu, 2022 WI 6, ¶18, 400 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=952384 - 2025-05-06
that we review de novo. See Waity v. No. 2024AP606 7 LeMahieu, 2022 WI 6, ¶18, 400 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=952384 - 2025-05-06
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. Interpretation of a written document affecting land is also a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131487 - 2014-12-10
that we review de novo. Interpretation of a written document affecting land is also a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131487 - 2014-12-10
Isaacs Holding Corp. v. Premiere Property Group, LLC
de novo. See State v. Hansford, 219 Wis. 2d 226, 246, 580 N.W.2d 171 (1998). ¶32 Discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6633 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See State v. Hansford, 219 Wis. 2d 226, 246, 580 N.W.2d 171 (1998). ¶32 Discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6633 - 2005-03-31