Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27511 - 27520 of 29828 for des.
Search results 27511 - 27520 of 29828 for des.
[PDF]
WI 85
de novo the court or circuit court commissioner's conclusion of law as to whether, based
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29560 - 2014-09-15
de novo the court or circuit court commissioner's conclusion of law as to whether, based
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29560 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Thomas E. Lengyel v. Sheboygan County
summary judgment presents a question of law which we review de novo, we still value a trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10287 - 2017-09-20
summary judgment presents a question of law which we review de novo, we still value a trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10287 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
No. 2010AP466-FT 9 reviews contentions of erroneous [exercise of] judicial discretion de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54057 - 2014-09-15
No. 2010AP466-FT 9 reviews contentions of erroneous [exercise of] judicial discretion de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54057 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
an advanced $500 fee by credit card. Attorney Krogman filed a motion for and notice of new (de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158271 - 2017-09-21
an advanced $500 fee by credit card. Attorney Krogman filed a motion for and notice of new (de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158271 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96400 - 2013-05-01
are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96400 - 2013-05-01
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Id. at 128. Since a defendant must show both deficient performance and prejudice, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72257 - 2011-10-12
de novo. Id. at 128. Since a defendant must show both deficient performance and prejudice, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72257 - 2011-10-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the appellate court reviews de novo. Id. ¶15 A protective search for a weapon is reasonable under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644542 - 2023-04-14
that the appellate court reviews de novo. Id. ¶15 A protective search for a weapon is reasonable under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644542 - 2023-04-14
[PDF]
State v. Kenosha County Board of Adjustment
conducting statutory certiorari judicial review, our standard of review of the circuit court's ruling is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10761 - 2017-09-20
conducting statutory certiorari judicial review, our standard of review of the circuit court's ruling is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10761 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144883 - 2017-09-21
review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144883 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Brian Hibl
constitutional principles to those facts. Id. This review presents a question of law for our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19755 - 2017-09-21
constitutional principles to those facts. Id. This review presents a question of law for our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19755 - 2017-09-21