Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27511 - 27520 of 33520 for ii.

State v. Antonio E. Arebalo
DISTRICT II State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15867 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the plea agreement. II. Ineffective assistance ¶28 We have concluded the State materially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98153 - 2013-06-17

2009 WI App 133
was filed. II. Analysis. ¶6 Lamar argues that he is entitled to additional sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39250 - 2009-09-28

WI App 60 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP1211 Complete Title of...
323, ¶17. II. Known danger exception ¶25 Socha, Greiner, and West Bend next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81059 - 2014-10-02

COURT OF APPEALS
, their acquiescence claim fails as a matter of law because the doctrine of acquiescence is inapplicable. II. Adverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112068 - 2014-05-12

State v. Terry Thomas
injustice has occurred. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis.2d 303 (1996). II. After sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13011 - 2005-03-31

State v. Tony M. Smith
appeals. II. DISCUSSION Smith claims he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8413 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. John Casteel
this argument sooner. We agree. We are bound by WIS. STAT. § 974.06(4) to dismiss his appeal. II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3171 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
materials, the court properly treated Schneider’s motion as a motion for summary judgment. II. Decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195032 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. Appeal No. 2011AP1059 Cir. Ct. No. 2008CV785 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80711 - 2012-04-10