Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27521 - 27530 of 30070 for de.

Thomas E. Lengyel v. Sheboygan County
a question of law which we review de novo, we still value a trial court’s decision on such a question. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10287 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
G.H. was born in Des Moines, Iowa, on July 25, 2008, to N.J. and M.H., and J.H. was born in Madison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155669 - 2017-09-21

Neil S. Hubbard v. Shaun Messer
of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Angela M.W. v. Kruzicki, 209 Wis. 2d 112, 121, 561 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16642 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 106
, interpretation of the injunction upon which the contempt finding is based is a question of law we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51966 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Thomas W. Koeppen
of a prior conviction must be a direct and specific admission by the defendant). We apply a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15136 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Leon M. Reyes v. Greatway Insurance Company
reviews de novo. State v. Bodoh, No. 97-0495-CR, op. at 4 (S. Ct. June 18, 1999); Manor v. Hanson
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17272 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Thomas R. Ward v. Town of Nashville
(Ct. App. 1990) (implicitly applying de novo review to issue whether judgment was final), overruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2481 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
fact that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Wilson, 2015 WI 48, ¶47, 362 Wis. 2d 193, 864 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218619 - 2018-09-05

[PDF] John D. May v. Joseph F. Cusick, M.D.
In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16033 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
records law … and has applied that law to undisputed facts, we review the circuit court’s decision de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121627 - 2014-09-16