Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27521 - 27530 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 27521 - 27530 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
6 The court also cited C.S.’s statement that he was not a lawyer, which “[brought] to [the] [c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=896652 - 2025-01-02
6 The court also cited C.S.’s statement that he was not a lawyer, which “[brought] to [the] [c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=896652 - 2025-01-02
[PDF]
State v. Henry W. Aufderhaar
verbatim in the footnote. 5 While the statement of 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6985 - 2017-09-20
verbatim in the footnote. 5 While the statement of 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6985 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI App 48
. (Emphasis added.) Weigel did not object to the above-emphasized statement. The State then recommended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=549045 - 2022-09-14
. (Emphasis added.) Weigel did not object to the above-emphasized statement. The State then recommended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=549045 - 2022-09-14
[PDF]
State v. Randolph S. Miller
corrected the trial court’s initial statement of the total maximum sentence at stake before stating he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5562 - 2017-09-19
corrected the trial court’s initial statement of the total maximum sentence at stake before stating he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5562 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Randolph S. Miller
corrected the trial court’s initial statement of the total maximum sentence at stake before stating he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5564 - 2017-09-19
corrected the trial court’s initial statement of the total maximum sentence at stake before stating he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5564 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of trial counsel. Instead, he alleged that the trial court’s statements led to his confusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215209 - 2018-07-10
assistance of trial counsel. Instead, he alleged that the trial court’s statements led to his confusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215209 - 2018-07-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and it sheds no light on any issue here. For example, it contains no statement that supports Ambac’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205694 - 2017-12-14
, and it sheds no light on any issue here. For example, it contains no statement that supports Ambac’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205694 - 2017-12-14
State v. Gustavo Hinojosa
Angela used in describing the sexual assault. It was not a statement of Officer Domagalski’s personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14582 - 2005-03-31
Angela used in describing the sexual assault. It was not a statement of Officer Domagalski’s personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14582 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. But instead, the prosecutor was only required to set forth a clear and specific statement of the reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147149 - 2015-08-24
. But instead, the prosecutor was only required to set forth a clear and specific statement of the reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147149 - 2015-08-24
[PDF]
State v. Randolph S. Miller
corrected the trial court’s initial statement of the total maximum sentence at stake before stating he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5560 - 2017-09-19
corrected the trial court’s initial statement of the total maximum sentence at stake before stating he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5560 - 2017-09-19